Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Jeff Moden (1/16/2009)
The article was actually first published on 12/6/2007 and it actually says that on the SSC home page where the article was listed. Why they decided to...
January 16, 2009 at 11:11 am
#928367
jcrawf02 (1/16/2009)It's because of a triangular join on the calendar table . . .
jcrawf02 (1/16/2009)
nice. 🙂
January 16, 2009 at 7:22 am
#928106
I liked this article the first time I read it, but why is it being presented as a new article with today's date?
lm
January 16, 2009 at 7:07 am
#928088