Viewing 8 posts - 106 through 113 (of 113 total)
I can't use identity column. The column should be char(3) (or int with 3 digits). Database is growing dynamically. So, identity column has only 999 combinations. I need some where close...
September 14, 2004 at 5:58 am
Everything depends on situation. It is may be right when you talking about 5-10 lookup tables. It may create madness for the databases with 100-200...
September 8, 2004 at 11:23 am
As you can see in article, real life scenario 2 is more complicated than the one table. It consists of 4 tables (in my case). Based on 4 tables...
August 11, 2004 at 6:41 am
As you can see from real live example (scenario 2) code table have id as integer. Group and type tables are very small (50-100 records each). And in a lot of...
August 11, 2004 at 6:35 am
As you can see in article, real life scenario 2 is more complicated than the one table. It consists of 4 tables (in my case). I don't like codes...
August 11, 2004 at 6:26 am
I don't know the easier way to make transaction and process separation and at the same time keep them both real time.
August 11, 2004 at 6:24 am
As you can see in article, real life scenario 2 is more complicated than the one table. It consists of 4 tables (in my case). I don't like codes...
August 11, 2004 at 6:19 am
Based on my experience I do believe that clustered index should be for every table. If table don't have a good candidate for the clustered index for whatever reason then...
August 11, 2004 at 5:51 am
Viewing 8 posts - 106 through 113 (of 113 total)