Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 60 total)
Short question
There is no default order of rows without an Order By clause. You may get the rows always sorted the same way,...
May 21, 2006 at 8:29 am
You "hear" to many things. Read the BOL instead, it's a free download.
Partitioned views and table partionning are 2 different beasts. Of course it knows where to store/get the data....
May 19, 2006 at 4:04 pm
Your "heard" half right. SQL2k AND SQL2k5 both support hash joins (among others). Everybody use them, although most people don't know it
The query...
May 19, 2006 at 3:57 pm
It depends. ETL is much faster and can handle much more complex logic. DTS (now renamed SSIS I think) are specialized for it.
ELT is a good choice when the amonount of...
May 19, 2006 at 12:05 pm
With SQL2K there is the unsupported xp_execresultset that was handy. With SQL2k5, you may have to rewrite it in C# I think.
Example (doing an insert but you get the point):
May 19, 2006 at 8:16 am
Noeld,
If you read the entire thread, you will notice that:
May 17, 2006 at 5:42 am
Datetime is an imprecise datatype. You always have +-3ms.
Try this:
Select cast('2006-05-15 23:59:59.999' as
May 15, 2006 at 12:15 pm
Here it goes:
/*
For performance reasons, I am using a RECVER (record version) column instead of the update timestamp.
That column exists to support optimistic concurrency across n database vendors
It...
May 13, 2006 at 4:06 pm
Ryan,
In did not forget the example. While coding it I discovered a flaw in my logic (I can end up with a data anomaly with the "first" row, i.e. the...
May 13, 2006 at 4:33 am
Sorry about the lack of examples Ryan. I posted the table structure but I had so many alternatives I had tried it would have been confusing. Some of them worked...
May 11, 2006 at 12:33 pm
Thanks for replying. I am doing a delta instead of a full copy because copying the full row would kill the server. We get thousands of tran per minutes. Some...
May 11, 2006 at 11:36 am
I got it right by guessing, since the choice of words was misleading. The OVER clause is a CLAUSE, not a FUNCTION. And the DENSE_RANK* answer was almost right by...
April 26, 2006 at 6:12 am
No effect on execution time. No effect on compilation time either but I suppose you should have some effect on parse time. It is also consuming some additional amounts of...
April 24, 2006 at 6:07 am
Please do not cross post to multiple forums.
You can store anything in SQL (anything that can be expressed digitally I mean ) ....
March 30, 2006 at 6:07 am
The question doesn't make much sense. Please provide some DDL if you want help. A "row" width is not calculated is number of characters, so I suppose you are refering...
March 5, 2006 at 2:10 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 60 total)