Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 604 total)
Oh I see what you are saying..thanks Gsquared
February 2, 2009 at 10:02 am
You'd have to know before-hand what kind of stuff they query.
- GSquared
I think I can get a pretty good list of the kinda stuff they query the most, but...
February 2, 2009 at 9:32 am
It does have a timestamp, I will try that.
THANKS MATT
Is there some way I can force/require them to use a date (or date range)?
February 2, 2009 at 9:30 am
Thanks Grant,
I'll experiment with both those options and look into using 08.
February 2, 2009 at 9:05 am
Thanks for answering Matt,
Yes this table is kind of a troubleshooting table. So, there are techs that need to see real time info.
I was trying to think of a...
February 2, 2009 at 9:04 am
Thanks SSCarpal Tunnel, I will try your suggestions!
January 29, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Just so I'm clear on this, you all think that SQL should be able to handle 300 unique inserts per second and still be able to handle queries run against...
January 29, 2009 at 10:22 am
Yeah..I know what u mean about adding a second table.
I guess I was thinking that the (#1) insert table would have no indexes or pkeys, and the (#2) searchable...
January 29, 2009 at 10:02 am
I haven't seen it yet, But I'm told it's diagnostic data. Users, transactions, searches that sorta thing. The table only has about 10 columns tho, fwiw.
Yes, they are querying...
January 29, 2009 at 9:43 am
You guys are right.
I tried it and it was no real benefit.
Thanks very much for your time, and knowledge.
January 29, 2009 at 9:14 am
Thanks Noel.
I was really just going to give it a shot and see what happens.
Here's the proc, sorry it's a long one..
Can anyone tell me where the hint would go?
ALTER...
January 28, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Thanks everyone, very informative.
I meant to write back sooner, but have been busy with your suggestions.
Thanks again, you all rock.
January 23, 2009 at 12:21 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 604 total)