Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 598 total)
Thanks SSCarpal Tunnel, I will try your suggestions!
January 29, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Just so I'm clear on this, you all think that SQL should be able to handle 300 unique inserts per second and still be able to handle queries run against...
January 29, 2009 at 10:22 am
Yeah..I know what u mean about adding a second table.
I guess I was thinking that the (#1) insert table would have no indexes or pkeys, and the (#2) searchable...
January 29, 2009 at 10:02 am
I haven't seen it yet, But I'm told it's diagnostic data. Users, transactions, searches that sorta thing. The table only has about 10 columns tho, fwiw.
Yes, they are querying...
January 29, 2009 at 9:43 am
You guys are right.
I tried it and it was no real benefit.
Thanks very much for your time, and knowledge.
January 29, 2009 at 9:14 am
Thanks Noel.
I was really just going to give it a shot and see what happens.
Here's the proc, sorry it's a long one..
Can anyone tell me where the hint would go?
ALTER...
January 28, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Thanks everyone, very informative.
I meant to write back sooner, but have been busy with your suggestions.
Thanks again, you all rock.
January 23, 2009 at 12:21 pm
Okay here ya go...
Here's the table & the indexes..
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[EventItems_rob](
[LogId] [int] NOT NULL,
[Company] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[CompanyId] [int] NOT NULL,
[Department] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[DepartmentId] [int] NOT NULL,
[CompanyCRN] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[DepartmentCRN] [varchar](50)...
January 21, 2009 at 7:29 am
Thanks Jeff
January 20, 2009 at 9:03 am
Thanks Matt
January 19, 2009 at 1:58 pm
It would be far more efficent if you put the values that are in the function into a look-up table and then use a join to update the values...
January 19, 2009 at 1:05 pm
Thanks for the quick replys.
I'm thinking I should create a new table with state, county, abbrev...
January 19, 2009 at 9:51 am
Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 598 total)