Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
For 2005, i get 0 rows returned for both the statements. Why?
June 21, 2011 at 6:49 am
apart from al syntax discussions, I enjoyed this question. Thanks QoD
June 21, 2011 at 4:29 am
I do not like this kind of question at all. The QotD should be a learning opportunity, with clear questions and no tricks.
There is nothing to be learned from this...
June 20, 2011 at 7:12 am
When rows are marked as deleted after a DML operation and the transaction is committed, the rows become Ghost records.
I got it right 🙂
June 2, 2011 at 12:43 am
nice question but setting arithabort on gives completely diff solution
June 1, 2011 at 4:31 am
if a clustered index already exists, SQL Server will enforce the Primary Key constraint with a nonclustered index
May 27, 2011 at 3:55 am
False, if a clustered index already exists, DB will enforce the Primary Key constraint with a nonclustered index
May 27, 2011 at 3:54 am
:cool::satisfied:Clustered index is newly created or rebuilt, it is physically and logically ordered as per the cluster key(s). But when data is inserted or the clustering key values are updated,...
May 27, 2011 at 3:45 am
got it right... this time with my understanding..........:cool:
May 27, 2011 at 2:35 am
Compression occurs in the storage engine and the data is presented to most of the other components of SQL Server in an uncompressed state. This limits the effects of compression...
May 27, 2011 at 2:19 am
The answers are different for each line.
In prefix compression, does the entire prefix stored in the header need to match the data to be used?
No
if I have a prefix of...
May 27, 2011 at 2:04 am
Nice Question, QotD.. keep us bugging like this only 🙂
May 26, 2011 at 1:06 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)