Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)

  • RE: Record created at subscriber, then deleted, then inserted again??

    Ran into this again, 5yrs later, and stumbled across my own post. I believe I've got a handle on what's happening here, and thought I could update this in...

  • RE: Replication - sp_msuplineageversion stuck

    Hi R.P. - that's a really good suggestion, it was one of the items we'd originally thought may be causing our problem. A couple years ago we had to...

  • RE: Replication - sp_msuplineageversion stuck

    I think you're right about maxversion_at_cleanup being a symptom of a bigger problem. We dropped the smaller article and re-published it over the weekend and the maxversion_at_cleanup reset back to...

  • RE: Replication - sp_msuplineageversion stuck

    Hi,

    Thanks for the response. Confirmed previously that the merge agent is locking tables that have a high maxversion_at_cleanup - one of the two tables that I mentioned - and I've...

  • RE: SSIS Data Flow Task Crashing

    Thanks for your reply again, sorry it took a bit for me to get back in here.

    I've tried running from BIDS debugger, from dtexec command line, and as a SQL...

  • RE: SSIS Data Flow Task Crashing

    I have, and there's plenty of RAM free (8GB of 16GB free when it crashes), but is there another limitation that I'm running into? Something per-process?

    I read that there's...

  • RE: PK Lookup Doing Table Scan?

    Just to reiterate some of the points from the other thread. Indexes are rebuilt nightly, and fragmentation doesn't seem to be a problem. Statistics are updated automatically, and...

  • RE: SSIS Data Flow Task Crashing

    I think I've found a workaround, but I'm not sure why this has to be done this way.

    Each log even will only have 1 matching lookup out of the 5....

  • RE: CPU Intensive Enumerating Changes

    I was going to look into a 'Plan Guide' to see if I could force the replication stored procedure to use the same clustered index seek that the query uses...

  • RE: CPU Intensive Enumerating Changes

    Attached is the profiler trace for when I executed sp_MSenumchanges_belongtopartition manually, showing it taking 8 minutes. Wait time on the process is zero, task state is running the whole...

  • RE: CPU Intensive Enumerating Changes

    I think I may be getting somewhere, anyone else have any suggestions on what to look at next? If I execute:

    exec sys.sp_MSenumchanges_belongtopartition

    38,

    100,

    '1510638,1510652,1510653,1510654,1510655,1510656',

    89259003,

    '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000',

    '8236EE55-51EF-4E2E-A0A6-B2D26781C214',

    1510638,

    1510656,

    1,

    0,

    'F6DE0C2C-3305-4F24-B272-7C9B84705A03'

    It takes 10 minutes to run.

    But, as...

  • RE: Storage Subsystems and RAMDisks

    Awesome, thanks Gail, Gus, and everyone else for your input. It only took a few dozen experts to convince me (and Gail explaining her article to me), but I...

  • RE: Storage Subsystems and RAMDisks

    GilaMonster (1/2/2013)


    RAM-only table-variables are indeed a myth.

    Table variables (like temp tables) will be in memory if possible and written to disk if not. They are always allocated space in TempDB,...

  • RE: Storage Subsystems and RAMDisks

    I know that at this point, for me the answer will still be "test various tempdb storage solutions, benchmark, and pick the best one for my environment". But I'm...

  • RE: Storage Subsystems and RAMDisks

    Gus, RE the isolation level, it's the default read committed, with snapshot off.

    L' Eomot Inversé (1/2/2013)


    I think that the source of confusion here is teh difference between allocating space for...

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)