Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Excellent knowledge-sharing! Thanks for taking the time to help.
December 16, 2009 at 6:17 am
In theory that sounds fine, in practice not so much:
Say I have Bull1 associated with Cust1, Cust2, Cust3, Cust4, Cust5. User now opens a UI screen with cust_checkboxes checked...
December 15, 2009 at 10:13 am
Not only is SS2000 popular, but I have a feeling there are many companies in the same boat we are: we'll never have enough staff to have time to migrate...
January 20, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Excellent post, really answered things. And thanks DCarlson too...good conversation. I suspected that separate dbs per version (on stage) was the way to go. But before we...
December 11, 2008 at 7:15 am
Dcarlson (12/10/2008)
December 10, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Dcarlson (12/10/2008)
Steve Jones - Editor (12/10/2008)
The database is the schema+data+physical files. You wouldn't put this into VCS. You would put in the scripts...
December 10, 2008 at 11:10 am
Matt Miller (12/9/2008)
We have 4 code branches in TFS (DEV/QA/MO/MAIN), which match up to 4 physical environments.
What do you do with different releases then? For ex, TFS/DEV/Release1, TFS/DEV/Release2 etc....
December 9, 2008 at 11:01 am
Does your source control merge the changes into the physical SPROC or just into the scripts that can generate the physical SPROC? My initial issue was really one about...
December 9, 2008 at 9:55 am
I mean versions of the Db. On my test server (and dev server too) where we do user testing we've always had a single db named ABC. Inside...
December 8, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Roy Ernest (12/8/2008)
When ever you change any Sproc or any object, it is done in a Branch.
"In a branch" means a branch inside the source control system that's holding...
December 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm
So what do you do when versions of, for ex a SPROC, conflict? Let's say V1 of your app is in production. V2 is in user testing. Now a bug...
December 8, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Thanks. And what about the physical tables, sprocs, etc. Do you typically keep completely different physical db's for each version of the app you're supporting, like what's done...
December 8, 2008 at 6:50 am
Good info. Is there any reason to specifically not include the directive for MARS in a connection string? Does it hurt existing code, even if it doesn't benefit...
December 1, 2008 at 12:45 pm
I think you're out of luck. I was disappointed when I saw that all MS provides for entering a SQL Statement is the squirrelly text box. It would be...
November 19, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)