Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 34 total)
Hi,
We have a similar scenario and have used queued Transactional Replication to the backup system - using all the default setting our latency is about 5 seconds.
Our plan, if the...
June 4, 2003 at 12:17 am
Hi,
And don't forget - Timestamp has nothing to do with date/time - it is simply a integer, incremented by one, on each row insert and update in a database.
Cheers, Peter
...
June 4, 2003 at 12:08 am
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your help - all is working well. In our load test (2 x 1.6Ghz Pentiums with 1Gb memory) there was no noticable change to user response times....
May 8, 2003 at 7:38 pm
Hi Jay,
machine problems hit and delayed work on replication. But we are looking good now although we hit problems with having the "If Update.." code in our Insert triggers. But...
May 7, 2003 at 2:26 am
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the prompt response. So, as I undestand it, we need both "NOT FOR.." and "IF UPDATE (msrepl_tran_version) RETURN" in all our triggers. I was concerned that...
May 5, 2003 at 7:10 am
Hi Jay,
Ok, we have restored the database and published one article (tblACNAcntCodes). The snapshot and creating the subscription worked fine.
See below for the two triggers involved. AAAA is our own...
May 5, 2003 at 6:51 am
Hi Jay,
Thanks for that. Yes the trigger is applied correctly at the subscriber but the nesting error is on the publisher.
Now that you have provided confirmation that what we are...
May 4, 2003 at 10:57 pm
Hi Jay,
Correct - it was before the AS. We did indeed start off with it after the AS which did give a syntax error.
Cheers, Peter
May 2, 2003 at 11:11 pm
OK - by deleting the XXX update trigger the error goes away. Further research revealed what seemed to be the answer - insert the line:
NOT FOR REPLICATION
just before the "AS"...
April 27, 2003 at 11:26 pm
Well we are passed first base but, unfortunately, we are not sure how. Our database has now been replicated to a second server - clearly we must have 'stumbled' into...
April 27, 2003 at 5:57 pm
Hi,
Yes - that was my general understanding maybe the point I'm missing is where the CALs are installed. I presume the physical install is on the Server if so, does...
February 12, 2003 at 9:36 pm
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the comment. But can you expand - what is a "see issue"?
Also, can you comment on my original question - will SQL Server perform a complete scan...
January 25, 2003 at 4:26 pm
Thanks for the feedback.
I don't have much experience in writing SQL - my background is Access and linking queries is common place. A view (to me) looked like a an...
January 24, 2003 at 11:59 pm
Hi Andy,
It would be great if I could do this but that code generates the error:
Runtime 3705
Operation is not allowed when the object is open.
Then, if I close the recordset,...
August 27, 2002 at 3:41 pm
Hi Andy,
It says: "..one important caveat: SQL Server can only support one active query on a connection" and goes on to say that the OLE-DB spec requires that extra connections...
August 26, 2002 at 7:04 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 34 total)