Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
Thanks for all of you help guys, this is exactly what Iwas looking for
Later jimmY
Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've never been hurt.
And Dance like no one...
August 27, 2003 at 10:29 am
Thanks for you help guys, I used BOL as well as the tech. spec's from Microsoft's web sight to make my decision.
jimmY
Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've...
August 18, 2003 at 11:39 am
Currently we are having a problem with blocks, so, we created a holding table and populated that table with what database, user, command, blocking spid, blockde spid, database id, wait...
August 15, 2003 at 11:50 am
The ISNULL(@kill , '') will replace the null value in @kill with a single space, this is needed because anything plus a null value results in a null.
jimmY
Work like you...
August 14, 2003 at 11:35 am
Confirm that your ODBC connection is valid, also, confirm that the user 'Helpdesk_ABC' is a user in the 'tech' database and has proper permission to complete that persons needed tasks.
jimmY
Work...
August 14, 2003 at 11:29 am
To give someone the capability to run scheduled tasks created a role in themsdb database and gave it these permissions, all in the msdb database. No, the only thing is...
August 7, 2003 at 11:54 am
I don't think that you can specify the backup filename when using a maintenance plan, what you could do is right click on the database and select all tasks|backup database...
August 4, 2003 at 11:30 am
I tried it with SQL Authentication, but the scheduler overides it with what it it running as. Also, due to security audits I am not allowed to have the other...
August 1, 2003 at 11:42 am
It may cause a deadlock, but couldn't you open another QA window and run a select count(*) based on what has ben updated. Just make sure to use the...
August 1, 2003 at 11:36 am
Sounds like your log file may be corrupted, have you tried sp_detach_db, then completly delete the log file, and run sp_attach_single_file_db?
jimmY
Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've never...
July 22, 2003 at 11:45 am
Allen_Cui - the local instance is SQL 2000 on windows 2000 profesional, and the remote is SQL 7 on NT4.0, both machine are running in mixed authentication mode.
martinvg - I...
July 22, 2003 at 11:29 am
Yes, it does mean every user will be kicked out of the database. The reson behind this is that SQL Server needs to have complete control over the db before...
July 16, 2003 at 11:24 am
Since the login problem started happeneing when you failed the cluster over, I would check to make sure all of the client ODBC connection are going against the proper cluster...
June 26, 2003 at 11:54 am
My Bad, I ment to say need to check for SQL Server up and running, but thanks i to complete that check as well.
So far, I am thinking...
June 25, 2003 at 9:49 am
Are you talking about Linking to multiple servers and running a stored procedure on each server, then yes you would have to have the procedure on all remote SQL Servers....
June 24, 2003 at 11:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)