Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 93 total)
What do you mean by "individual join"?
Good question! I have used collate in joins before. It seems that this question isn't really about collation, but more about what the...
April 21, 2025 at 12:53 pm
Thanks, Steve. That makes more sense.
March 6, 2025 at 6:04 pm
Thanks for the article. I'm struggling to find a situation where I would actually choose CHOOSE. (See what I did there?) I don't want to hard code values into CHOOSE....
March 6, 2025 at 1:24 pm
They're not orphaned. Orphaned users are in the database, but do not have a corresponding login associated with them. You have the opposite. These are server logins that have not...
January 16, 2025 at 2:08 pm
My mistake. Sysusers actually represents logins, not users. I haven't referenced that view in a long time. Logins get created at the server level and users get created at the...
January 16, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Yeah, you can't update system catalogs. We haven't been able to do that since SQL 2000, I think. Also, sys.sysusers is an old view that's only there for backward compatibility. ...
January 16, 2025 at 1:41 pm
I have to agree with edmil. A hash bailout occurs when a hashing operation reaches its maximum recursion level and shifts to an alternative query plan to process the remaining...
January 9, 2025 at 1:52 pm
From BOL:
Nested comments are supported. If the /* character pattern occurs anywhere within an existing comment, it is treated as the start of a nested comment and, therefore, requires a...
October 23, 2024 at 3:23 pm
Archie,
You are correct. That was an over sight on my part. I didn't test it with SQL 2000. The question should have stated that this was for...
November 23, 2011 at 6:43 am
Hugo,
Thanks for the feedback. I agree that the explanation could be better, but through my research on the topic, I couldn't find an adequate explanation for this behavior. ...
November 23, 2011 at 6:41 am
Disregard my last post. I just realized that the SQL Server Express server is not in mixed mode, which probably accounts for the NULL.
Greg
July 21, 2011 at 9:53 am
I tried it on several of our servers, both 2005 and 2008, and received '1900-01-01 00:00:00.000'. All of these were enterprise edition. I also tried it on one...
July 21, 2011 at 9:47 am
Today is also the day that the Titanic sank and President Abraham Lincoln died.
Doh!! Someone beat me to it!
April 15, 2011 at 6:56 am
Great job, Craig! This is a great idea for a topic. One that isn't discussed often. I cannot count the number of horrendous job postings that I...
April 14, 2011 at 8:35 am
Yes, it was possible to move the resource database in SQL2005.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408%28v=SQL.90%29.aspx
Thanks,
Greg
February 11, 2011 at 6:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 93 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy