Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 495 total)
While I see the flaw in the question, folks don't have to be so mean pointing it out -- that sort of feedback would certainly keep me from offering up...
August 12, 2010 at 8:05 am
Shrinking a log file (a bad thing in general to do) will have its results dependant upon whether the log backup has been taken and the pertinent log file truncated...
August 12, 2010 at 7:43 am
Without that other log backup you are hosed. You either have to get that other backup file and apply it somehow or start over and redo log shipping with...
August 12, 2010 at 7:38 am
STANDBY allows you to do read-only queries against the data whereas NORECOVERY is completely offline. STANDBY requires the .tuf file to manage its use. I have never seen...
August 12, 2010 at 7:36 am
OK, so it wasn't just me staring and trying to decide between "error" and "4" then. Finally picked "4" because that error wouldn't be the GROUP BY error.
August 12, 2010 at 7:31 am
If only it were just a growing log file. We have separate files for very large tables on separate LUNs and spindles, and I found that those files double...
August 11, 2010 at 8:36 am
That one WAS an SSIS failure; you are past the previous error. At this point, best I can tell you to do is set the package to log its...
August 10, 2010 at 10:34 am
Speaking not about the product but the idea behind the editorial, I can't tell you how painful the size issue is. It causes reindex havoc for me because in...
August 10, 2010 at 9:06 am
It's not the package that needs to change, it's the job proxy. This is a server config issue. A proxy is used to give an execution environment for...
August 10, 2010 at 8:31 am
If sp_who2 shows it as running, it's running, and you have no errors -- it's running.
If it is taking much longer than usual, first thing I can think...
August 9, 2010 at 2:40 pm
How big is your database? How long does it normally take? Do you have errors? It could simply be that it takes that long. I/O and...
August 9, 2010 at 2:11 pm
Just re-read the original question, I agree with Gail it's non-clustered to clustered. OK, if you have PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED you are in my opinion where you want to...
August 9, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Yep, this is why I NEVER use PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED even IF I intend to cluster on that column. I am willing to burn the index space and index...
August 9, 2010 at 2:05 pm
There is no way to say without seeing the code that is failing. Without that I would guess that you have search queries without ORDER BY in it that...
August 9, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 495 total)