Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
PS... my version of money and happiness...
"Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy you a sailboat big enough that you can sail right up next to it."
July 29, 2022 at 5:49 pm
Thank you Scott; I had not considered having a fixed start point, working backwards, then go pick up new rows "after" (step 60). This does remove the concern about accomplishing...
July 29, 2022 at 5:48 pm
That one is next on the list now as of this morning.
The Virtual guys are now discussing Cisco firmware updates... apparently (in the environment where nothing changed on 8/3), we...
September 8, 2019 at 4:48 pm
Thank you for the suggestions Frederico. We've done ALL of those already.
We just stood up a new server, pristine install on everything, same results.
I just upgraded the test environment to...
September 8, 2019 at 7:53 am
Here is the base fact set as of right now...maybe someone else will encounter this some day...
VMWare 6.7U3 HW level 15. Suddenly last week... a well-behaved server with well known...
September 8, 2019 at 4:33 am
Because at the moment... it's a baseline. And the scenario is more than just 1 query... there are hundreds of otherwise (previously) well behaved queries that now either run for...
September 7, 2019 at 6:08 pm
No Joy...
Back to forcing maxdop @ 1 for our sample query gives data in 47 seconds... maxdop 2, the query shows running, but there is NOTHING happening on activity monitor. ...
September 6, 2019 at 2:20 pm
Grant... despite the pre-requisite "nothing has changed" answer from everyone involved in this environment...
I was discovered this morning that VMWare 6.7u3 was applied (upgrading from VMware 6.7u2) 5 days before...
September 6, 2019 at 12:23 am
Thanks for the answers guys; I had wondered about the row threshold, but was not sure if that could even be a possibility.
I did roll maxdop down to 1 at...
September 4, 2019 at 3:38 pm
lptech (2/12/2015)
then you should make your management aware of that fact
That's what my wall of shame dashboard is for. The thing that makes it difficult (in this scenario, however)...
February 12, 2015 at 3:11 pm
Jeff, your argument is exactly why I haven't put the Kill statement in the middle of my foreign process detective code (that records all open connections, statements, run time, user...
February 12, 2015 at 1:21 pm
Clever idea... I had not thought of that. The big question would be if that change kicked in immediately (changing the behavior of existing open connections, and possibly running...
February 12, 2015 at 11:33 am
Ah... an idealist in the group. 😉
You are exactly right.. they don't understand the data model, and to the institutions discredit... haven't spent enough time (and money) on training...
February 12, 2015 at 10:21 am
This sounds familiar to ETL performance gremlins I've been chasing lately. If we assume that the procedure and database are capable of better performance, I would assume the problem...
January 31, 2015 at 10:37 am
I will start reading up on indexes with partitions. On the brighter side... I have convinced the DBA's here to start working up a plan to migrate to '08.
Thank...
May 22, 2014 at 2:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)