Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 125 total)
Why you are not implementing a custom log shipping is almost trivial.
April 26, 2005 at 9:31 am
It looks like you have different collations between server A and B or between the databases/columns on A and B.
Maybe you can try moving data using a SELECT query...
April 26, 2005 at 9:26 am
You might not be able to prevent database corruption due to controllers malfunction using logshipping because corruption will propagate to the DR server via the transaction logs restore.
The logshipping will...
April 26, 2005 at 9:21 am
I use the maintenance plan only for rebuilding indexes and check databases. Is simpler and it works.
The only complain that I have is that adding a step for alerting using...
March 4, 2005 at 8:38 am
Setting up replication it is fairly easy regardless the type, but debugging it in case something goes wrong or uninstalling it I find very difficult and the uninstall very messy.
Ionel
January 20, 2005 at 8:37 am
Thank you very much for your help, I don't know how I didn't think at it.
Ionel
January 7, 2005 at 9:06 am
I am working with Microsoft Support to solve the issue.
I don't want to hard code the number of open objects since that number should ajust itself dynamically.
The temp...
June 21, 2004 at 2:44 pm
More info
It is a Win 2000 server with SQL Server 2000 SP3a, 2GB RAM. Dynamic allocated memory.
I am getting also messages at the crush time
2004-06-21 09:59:11.90 logon Login failed...
June 21, 2004 at 8:11 am
I read that article several times, didn't find anything to point me to the cause.
May 10, 2004 at 10:11 am
I got the proper result in my opinion.
mssqlsvc/<server name - full qualified>:1433
I even reboot the server, but still get the message.
May 6, 2004 at 10:06 am
Since you set the /3GB switch to let 1GB to the operating system why did you set up also a "max server memory"?
April 20, 2004 at 12:21 pm
1. if you haven't done that make sure that unnecessary services are stopped
2. check the cluster logs for an error message regarding gathercl.dll. If you have it you will have...
April 15, 2004 at 9:25 am
Nothing much, our security guy want to install it on the SQL cluster and I am trying to get some opinions about that. Did you have any issue with Trend?
April 14, 2004 at 7:45 am
It seems that it is the AD Group Policy that is overwriting the Local security policy.
Thank you very much guys.
April 13, 2004 at 9:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 125 total)