Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)
I might be wrong, ( i left my inside sql server 2000 book at work ) but I think if that is you only nullable column it will actually add...
December 3, 2004 at 1:15 am
The lowest level of the clustered indexes in SQL Server are the data pages, so if you move the clustered index, you are in fact moving the data.
December 3, 2004 at 1:05 am
Is your sa password null or have you intentionally left it out of the connection string?
I won't rant about connecting using 'sa', especially from and ASP page, but...
December 3, 2004 at 12:56 am
Hi,
If you look in BOL under:
SQL Server Architecture
Relational Database Engine Architecture
Server Scalability
The SQL Server 2000 Workload Governor
You will find a fairly good explanation of when the governor kicks in and...
December 3, 2004 at 12:50 am
Are you seeing any deadlocks, or is it just blocking?
December 3, 2004 at 12:36 am
Is this what you are looking for:
SELECT CH1.Name
, CH1.Address
, CH1.PhoneNumber
, CH1.CallDate
, datediff("D",CH1.CallDate,getdate()) DaysAgo
FROM CallHistory ch1
, (SELECT CH2.Name, max(CH2.CallDate) CallDate
FROM HostileCallers HC
,...
December 3, 2004 at 12:18 am
Is the requirement to have all databases exist within a single SQL2000 instance, or can you merely move all five instances to a single machine?
May 13, 2004 at 10:29 pm
Just a couple of questions before I suggest anything.
Are the users required to log into your app and is their login state persisted in the database? Do you have a...
April 25, 2004 at 4:28 pm
While trying to manufacture a semophoric method for locking a stored procedure by implementing something like a procedure execution state table that is constantly updated, SQL 2000 has the perfect...
April 22, 2004 at 12:33 am
My only concern would be the use of the WITH RECOMPILE. If this is really necessary I would suggest putting each of the the UPDATE statements into separate procedures and...
March 25, 2004 at 2:58 pm
The problem is that your selects are using different access paths than the update uses and this will cause deadlocks in a system with significant usage. If you do as...
March 24, 2004 at 2:02 am
Sakis,
You say that you end up with different results sets when using nine more FETCH NEXT's after the FETCH ABSOLUTE. I assume this is due to the ORDER BY clauses not...
March 20, 2004 at 1:51 am
Well, if you do not want to implement a temp table or table variable, and you are not ordering by a unique index, I am not sure you can accomplish...
March 18, 2004 at 5:16 pm
Assuming you have a primary key or a unique index on the partners table, the solution is quite simple and doesn't involve using a cursor. If you order the query...
March 17, 2004 at 11:24 pm
Actually the IF does reset @@error. If you've coded assuming it does not, you may want to revisit that sql.
The test :
raiserror('an error happened',16,1)
select @@error
result
------
Server: Msg 50000, Level 16,...
October 22, 2003 at 1:25 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)