Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Thank you, so it seems like you can never be sure how SQL server will treat errors inside a transaction.
If you look at the code in the following example, its...
September 22, 2011 at 11:40 am
Okay thank you. There seems to be an essential, yet so vague distinction between the initial size and default size of a database.
Conclusions by this thread:
- ALTER DATABASE ... MODIFY...
February 23, 2011 at 6:15 pm
Hi, thanks for your input. If this is the expected behavior of the shrink command, then the documentation is wrong or misleading:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190488(v=SQL.90).aspx
The database cannot be made smaller than...
February 21, 2011 at 4:01 pm
I must have encountered a bug in SQL Server 2005:
When you increase the initial size of a database using ALTER DATABASE, the DBCC shrinking commands ignores that size.
The following code...
February 21, 2011 at 6:11 am
Thanks, I know I shouldn't be shrinking my database. I'm just trying to figure out how shrinking works and how it relates to the initial/default file size.
I argue that DBCC...
January 27, 2011 at 2:38 pm
Thanks for your inputs.
philcart (10/1/2009)
October 7, 2009 at 8:18 am
Omg, I just solved the case after 10 hours of googling!
Client and server are not joined to a domain/AD (seems overkill for just two machines).
Hence they were unable to use...
March 3, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)