Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
Why not just ask it?
SELECT max_workers_count
FROM sys.dm_os_sys_info;
July 5, 2019 at 1:42 pm
"I don't know why they made this decision instead of structuring things like this..."
Because ANSI SQL.
April 17, 2018 at 12:11 pm
Much better article at http://rusanu.com/2010/03/26/using-tables-as-queues/
April 5, 2010 at 5:00 am
DELETE t
FROM dbo.mt_fact_scanned t JOIN
(SELECT recipient_id, time_id, sender_id, sender_ip, MAX(msg_count) MaxCount
FROM dbo.mt_fact_scanned
GROUP BY recipient_id, time_id, sender_id, sender_ip)x
ON t.recipient_id = x.recipient_id AND t.time_id = x.time_id
AND t.sender_id = x.sender_id AND...
September 17, 2009 at 7:12 pm
kamau.john (9/17/2009)
Nevermind, figured it out. I"ll wrap the search param with % before suppling sp_executesql.
Or you can wrap the param in the dynamic code.
Set @sql = 'SET @ss...
September 17, 2009 at 7:45 am
This is an interesting sequence of questions... :Whistling:
EXEC sp_helpdb;
You are on your own to break the sa password.
September 17, 2009 at 7:27 am
UPDATE t SET yield = b.yield + DATEDIFF(d,b.date,t.date)*1. / DATEDIFF(d,b.date,a.date) * (a.yield - b.yield)
FROM
dbo.mytable t JOIN
(SELECT id,
(SELECT TOP 1 id
FROM dbo.mytable
WHERE service = m.service AND...
September 17, 2009 at 7:16 am
Jeff Moden (9/16/2009)
September 16, 2009 at 11:52 am
SQL Server takes care of concurrency issues for you, which is reason to try and use it instead of write your own. As I write, one statement is an atomic...
September 16, 2009 at 11:34 am
You do not need most of that code. You can do it in one statement, and one statement is an atomic transaction.
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.usp_GetNextNumber @pNumberRange AS nvarchar(20), @pNextValue AS int...
September 16, 2009 at 10:40 am
Jean-Sebastien Carle (8/19/2009)
HansVE (8/19/2009)
1. You do not know of subnetting?Subnetting can easily be achieved using bitmasking on integer IPs. The following will yield 192.168.1.0 :
SELECT [dbo].[IPAddressToString]([dbo].[IPAddressToInteger]('192.168.1.1') & [dbo].[IPAddressToInteger]('255.255.255.0'))
I guess the...
August 19, 2009 at 11:39 am
DC (8/19/2009)
August 19, 2009 at 11:02 am
rja.carnegie (8/19/2009)
lhowe (8/19/2009)
August 19, 2009 at 9:26 am
nimdil (8/19/2009)
The idea with four columns - while not bad - has some flaws:
1. There is no merits with 1NF as IP address is a complete being. Would you store...
August 19, 2009 at 7:49 am
I store these as four tinyint columns. Also uses just four bytes but is human-readable, does not require all your conversions, has implicit validation, and better meets the 1NF...
August 19, 2009 at 6:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy