Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 35 total)
Hi David,
Thanks for the quick help. This solves my problem
Regards,
GB
February 15, 2006 at 2:06 am
Hi All,
I can understand this problem may belongs to some network devices. But why every thing goes fine when I restart the SQL Server Service only (NOT THE SERVER ITSELF)? Furthermore,...
February 10, 2006 at 1:33 am
Hi,
My problem solved by doing this:
1) CHECKPOINT
2) sp_repltrans (i got some pending records)
3) EXEC sp_repldone @xactid = NULL, @xact_segno = NULL, @numtrans = 0, @time = 0, @reset = 1
4)...
February 4, 2006 at 1:28 am
Hello Asim,
Sorry boss for this late reply.
This is a nice trick to resolve this but SQLRS must have some native way to achieve the same. I think we can anything...
October 30, 2005 at 1:46 am
Hi All,
Before posting this Q, i've done all such routine inquires like: event logging, pinging, map-sharing and even i'd restarts my client stations. But the only way to resolve this...
October 26, 2005 at 10:13 pm
Hi,
Even I'm very happy using drop/add trick. But changing the ordinal position doesn't look good when you see your table like your main field is lying at the bottom/most RHS....
August 18, 2005 at 11:18 pm
Hi Gordon,
This can be a big missing element in Sql2k Server and I don't want that drop/add trick even-though I've not used * anywhere. What about Sql2k5 should we hope...
August 15, 2005 at 11:09 pm
Thanks Sushila,
I've found the reason of this problem, actually I'm using a user-defined function in my derived query, also i'm using SP3. This is a bug in SQL2k and it's...
August 8, 2005 at 11:53 pm
Thanks all,
Finally I successfully took backup on remote location by mapping a drive from Sql server. But initially when it was taking backup on network, the server got lots of...
July 28, 2005 at 11:17 pm
Thanks Hanslindgren, indeed your suggestion is the needful solution of my current problem. Now I'll will do these things:
1) From now, I'll create small tables for each month (with m...
July 15, 2005 at 10:59 pm
Yes this is exactly I want, but should I wait for Sql2k5 due to easy administration and a new way to implement it - TABLE Partition including the consideration of...
July 15, 2005 at 12:10 am
Exactly, how constraints will gonna work? This I don't know at the moment, let me try this on some sample database to get some results, but about performance, as Chris...
July 11, 2005 at 10:06 pm
Chris, please guide me about partition on replicated data? Now is it possible to segregate data after its being published?
Govind
July 11, 2005 at 4:29 am
Yes, this will solve my problem but... My database is merge-replicated and It will take longer to re-create my subscribers. And dropping some table will be... but I'll try this.
Thanks...
July 7, 2005 at 10:24 pm
Because I have queried those big tables directly by their name, I've not create any view as wrapper against them. So it will cause lots of code + stored-procedures changes....
July 7, 2005 at 3:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 35 total)