Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 262 total)
And what security settings are you using on the linked server?
September 8, 2008 at 7:58 am
If you can audit it in SQL server, why would you need to repeat the same task with the same results in Oracle?
September 8, 2008 at 7:54 am
In addition it should be SQL 2005 64 bit edition accessing SQL 2000 32 bit edition.
Easiest solution is:
On SQL 2000 side run the following script:
create procedure sp_tables_info_rowset_64 @table_name sysname, @table_schema...
September 8, 2008 at 7:27 am
This is Crystal Reports related error (usually means some DLL are missing from a folder) and it is not related to the SQL server.
September 5, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Sounds like a standard Audit solution on a database?
Something like this: http://www.sqlteam.com/article/centralized-asynchronous-auditing-with-service-broker
September 5, 2008 at 12:49 pm
And shouldn't the variation of "100 ms" in execution be random ?
In test I ran (using your code) for the table with 3 columns and 3 parameters I am receiving...
September 5, 2008 at 7:23 am
These are two distinct solutions I suggested.
Either use OUTPUT and INSERT OUTPUT to a temp table and then process the data inserted to a temp table to insert in any...
September 4, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Gail,
would it be then proper to consider that on a table with search on an unindexed column the
'WHERE @param = something or field = @param" and
"WHERE field = @param or...
September 4, 2008 at 1:00 pm
1. OUTPUT INSERTED INTO temptable.
2. Create a trigger.
September 4, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Update is a Delete and Insert.
Your only bet is to change a design.
September 4, 2008 at 12:23 pm
I remember reading in one of the blogs that SQL Server does short-circuit evaluation, but it was not specified under what conditions.
September 4, 2008 at 11:53 am
The /3GB and /userva parameters are valid only on boot entries for 32-bit versions of Windows on computers with x86 or x64-based processors.
September 4, 2008 at 11:42 am
Can you check your error log? Do you have any error messages stating "insufficient memory"?
Also, just from curiosity: why are using SP1?
September 4, 2008 at 11:26 am
Just my 5 cents.
There is no prevailing wisdom. There is a situational wisdom.
You are bringing it from a conversation link where you are suggesting to use a NOLOCK in a...
September 4, 2008 at 10:56 am
Can you try changing the order in your WHERE clause to 'WHERE (@num1 = 0 or colOne = @num1)'?
September 4, 2008 at 10:05 am
Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 262 total)