Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 76 total)
We haven't found that to be a problem, but then we're only allowing single record operations by the apps (add a record, change an existing record, etc.).
This model was originally...
April 6, 2010 at 7:44 am
Good questions.
Security is disabled for multiple records in this article to keep things simple.
The model allows one to dynamically change the security of any user without explicitly changing...
April 6, 2010 at 7:25 am
Thank you for that.
Those tables not involved in any relationships are not displayed (by design), but to display them simply add this snippet just before the script displays the final...
February 9, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Hi Nick,
Thank you for your response.
You are correct in that we have no way to see redirects in other email systems, so redirections from them to your own are possible....
October 20, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Nice article - looking forward to see how it plays out.
October 1, 2009 at 9:05 am
Thank you for the reply.
I can do this, but it will take a couple of weeks before I can get to it.
I will reply when it's done.
Glen Cooper
June 9, 2009 at 5:24 pm
That's an interesting reply.
I should have made a subtle distinction between mailing lists and re-directions. Although the latter may be viewed as a special case of the former, you...
May 26, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Good question.
Nothing automatic is done to resolve the issues, so that's worth investigating.
May 22, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Thank you for the kind replies.
This work was motivated by a problem I had with a marketing company in Vancouver, where the database administrator was frequently interrupted by requests to...
May 22, 2009 at 12:18 pm
This is an excellent article, and long overdue.
Is there a standard boiler-plate for this?
April 18, 2009 at 3:38 pm
OK, this is an ugly kludge for SQL Server 2000.
Replace the snippet for creating the preorder table with the one below.
I can't think of a better way to do this.
Glen
--...
March 23, 2009 at 3:39 pm
OK, I'll get back to you on this.
Glen
March 23, 2009 at 1:50 pm
Yes, tables involved in no relationships are ignored, for simplicity.
Glen
March 20, 2009 at 12:16 pm
A few years ago I had a similar problem, where row-oriented security was needed in a medical faculty:
http://www.newdalesystems.com/articles/Article014.pdf
Although this overview doesn't mention field permissions, that was...
March 3, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 76 total)