Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 295 total)
SQL 2005 is not due that soon and SQL 2000 is fairly mature
It'll be more expensive than SQL 2000 and I'd wait until the first service pack at least before...
November 2, 2004 at 3:01 am
EXEC sp_detach_db 'tempdb'
gives
Server: Msg 7940, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
System databases master, model, msdb, and tempdb cannot be detached.
Unless SQL had trace flag 3608 (from memory, and that's for...
October 22, 2004 at 2:43 am
Does teh query use an indexed view? This will be treated differently...
October 20, 2004 at 3:54 am
.Connect = "ODBC;DSN=SiteMaster;Description=SiteMaster" _
& ";UID=passthru;PWD=passthru;DATABASE=sitemaster" _
& ";Network=DBMSSOCN;Address=sqlvirtsrv,1433"
.ReturnsRecords = True
Here you'ce specified a DSN (in teh registry I guess) which will be overridden by the "Address = param"
Also, what is the...
October 20, 2004 at 3:48 am
A dedicated SQL Server is best using all the RAM it wants.
If you're running server side applications such as IIS with SQL as well, then what may have happened is...
October 11, 2004 at 4:19 am
See "Security Account Delegation" in BOL for the full story without impersonation as such
October 5, 2004 at 5:39 am
It also happens if your NT group or user has been renamed.
One of our 3rd party apps requires the domain user as a login eg DOMAIN\InitialSurname
On marriage, we have to...
September 30, 2004 at 2:04 am
Depending on the politics of the situation...
Can you increase the sa password length or change it regularly?
A long enough password will not be cracked before its time to change it...
September 27, 2004 at 8:22 am
The named pipes issue happens because a server listens on
"\\LIVE1\pipe\sql\query"
I tried and failed to get (my equivalent) DR1 to do the same thing.
If your clients are XP or have...
September 7, 2004 at 7:06 am
use sp_setnetname to modify the datasource property of sysservers. You don;t have to hack the system tables.
Our linked servers are all "virtual" - so our DR server is called "SPARESERVER"...
September 7, 2004 at 5:06 am
If XACT_ABORT is set then the batch aborts, rather than the error being trapped, that sounds like what's happening here.
September 7, 2004 at 3:26 am
In this case, nothing, because in the first the UPDATE statement is a transaction itself.
No, you only need explicit begin and commit if you have a mult-statement "unit of work"
Eg
SET...
September 6, 2004 at 3:31 am
xp_smtp_sendmail?
Where did this come from... aint a standard object
September 6, 2004 at 2:22 am
Oddly enough (or not...) the archiving routine is for a 3rd party app and it has "SELECT INTO...", I've no control over the code.
I trawled google for stuff on SQL...
August 3, 2004 at 5:57 am
Not always poor SQL...
If your CPUs are hyperthreaded (Xeon 2Ghz+, top end P4 etc) then SQL will parallel across all CPUs - physical and logical, when it shouldn't really.
HTT is...
August 3, 2004 at 5:37 am
Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 295 total)