Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 295 total)
See the following KB articles.
Hotifx 961 fixed our issues dating back 2+ years with a 3rd party app, large cursor, linked server. The first hotfix didn't do much.
We're running HF961...
January 21, 2005 at 2:30 am
@@SERVERNAME queries the table sysservers, hence why sp_addserver etc is required.
Correctly:
ServerProperty('ServerName') does not return the network name. It returns "machinename\sqlinstancename" or "machinename" if the default instance.
ServerProperty('MachineName') gives the actual server...
January 13, 2005 at 3:31 am
Encrypt the data at the column level.
See http://www.activecrypt.com for details on how to do column level encrption.
January 13, 2005 at 3:27 am
CXPacket errors can occur when parallel queries require time for each sub-thread to catch up.
For example Dual CPU with Hyper-Threading can generate a 4 way parallel query. Because hyper-threading is...
January 12, 2005 at 4:38 am
That's kinda reassuring, thanks.
At least it aint me...
What I forgot was the original server was SQL Standard, but the new server is Enterprise (temporarily, it's due to be decommissioned soon...
January 12, 2005 at 3:11 am
I agree with previous posters.
Use LiteSpeed or similar, if you haven't much data use the native SQL routines
Whatever you do, don't use an "agent" that hooks into SQL.
It backups a...
January 11, 2005 at 4:13 am
I agree that ordinarily multiple arrays will be better than single array, but surely it depends on database size, design etc. Server limitations also play a part.
Given an 8 disk...
December 8, 2004 at 1:21 am
I'm more with Frank on this.
I benchmarked different disk configs and found multi spindle RAID 10 the best (as in 6 or 8 disks upwards).
I'd go this way:
RAID 1 -...
December 7, 2004 at 3:29 am
OK Then
varchar it is, sod the local variations
'yyyymmddhhmmss' etc
ho hum.
December 3, 2004 at 6:01 am
If I have to specify dates, I try to use '04 Sep 2004' for constants etc.
I'm UK and I've found it easier to use this rather than yyyymmdd etc that...
December 3, 2004 at 2:54 am
This should be OK.
Upgrade your MDAC as well if you can.
From XP onwards, MDAC is part of the OS.
I've come across this before on some of our older Win2k SP2...
November 19, 2004 at 3:51 am
From the licensing FAQ:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/howtobuy/faq.asp
Reporting Services is part of the SQL Server 2000 license. There is not a separate license for Reporting Services. If you have a licensed copy...
November 17, 2004 at 3:55 am
Given that RS is pretty much entirely data driven, as in the reports, the schedules and god knows what else are all in the DB, then it would make sense...
November 17, 2004 at 2:40 am
What are we meant to see?
The links don't work...
November 17, 2004 at 2:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 295 total)