Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
John, you should have my contact info in your private box. If not, reply here and I'll resend.
February 10, 2009 at 11:11 pm
John, agreed. It sounds like a "pseudo transaction" table might be your best short-term solution. Depending on your schemas on both sides, you could possibly get away with...
February 10, 2009 at 11:02 pm
Steve, you're correct -- the code's not much at all. In fact, if you've implemented any kind of a data access layer (as I have in almost all my...
February 10, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Also, you do NOT want to use ODBC with VFP -- the driver hasn't been updated since version 6 of VFP, and it's a pain to use. Far better...
February 10, 2009 at 10:44 pm
John,
In VFP, a "database container" is really just another table with a DBC extension. Each table that is part of the container has its header modified to hold the...
February 10, 2009 at 10:42 pm
John, check your private message box.
There's a couple of other ways than using DLL's to read from/write to VFP tables, depending on their structure, the relationships between the tables, and...
February 10, 2009 at 10:29 pm
DTS is, as Steve mentioned, the fastest way.
I believe also that the OLE DB driver for VFP will handle 2.6 tables without a problem, and may prove to actually work...
March 8, 2004 at 12:30 pm
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)