Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
Jeff
It would be nice to re-design the database, but it was designed before I got here, and I cannot pitch to management that we need to re-design an existing application...
February 18, 2004 at 9:04 am
I agree.
Too bad that both of my user groups need current data with little latency between both databases.
EP
February 18, 2004 at 8:23 am
Looks like we are going to do the two server route.
On the brighter side, this will give me an excuse to play around with replication features and should give me a...
February 17, 2004 at 12:15 pm
Good idea, but I already have the max degree of parallelism set to 3.
But thanks, I didnt know about that option and will have to remember it for the...
February 17, 2004 at 8:49 am
Then again I think that there valid reasons for shrinking a database....
February 17, 2004 at 8:29 am
Well I was hoping that this was somthing that Microsoft had added.
Especially considering that the MS code was originally based on the Sybase code line and the fact that Sybase has...
February 17, 2004 at 8:17 am
I looked at the affinity mask option, but I am not sure that it will do what I am looking for. My environment is truly mixed workload. The batch folks kick...
February 16, 2004 at 12:40 pm
Thanks Ken, this is exactly what I was looking for
January 30, 2004 at 7:47 am
When you did the upgrade, was it an upgrade or did you install a new instance of SQLServer 2000 and still have the old one running on the same machine....
January 29, 2004 at 10:28 am
The easiest way is to put a few print statements into the trigger and then execute the stored prcedure in SQL Query Analyzer.
If you really know how far...
December 10, 2003 at 2:46 pm
Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)