Viewing 7 posts - 76 through 82 (of 82 total)
It is NO SQL if the end-user does not use SQL.
The ODBC enabled application (Win32 PERL, etc.) would build/execute the SQL statements.
This is necessary for two reasons.
(1) The end-user can...
September 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm
Thanks for the link to my post at Microsoft Developers Forum regarding Jet (Red) Engine Databases.
Also, FYI, I have issued 510 concurrent independant SQL processes on Windows 7 Home Premium...
September 10, 2015 at 2:59 pm
For discussion purposes, so that both myself and others can gain an understanding of the potential limitations of Jet Engine file system databases vs. SQL Server databases for midrange, Live...
September 10, 2015 at 1:15 pm
Yes I stand corrected. It does appear that SQL Server has grown in recent years from 1 Terabyte to 1/2 Petabyte capacity.
SQL Server Express has a 10 GIG limit...
September 9, 2015 at 2:43 pm
I consider it downsizing to go to SQL Server from Jet Engine because my understanding is that SQL Server cannot match Jet Engine for size and speed. Can SQL...
September 9, 2015 at 2:19 pm
The Jet I am referring to is the Jet Engine used by Microsoft Access 2002-2003. Jet 4.x
You don't need MS-ACCESS.
I refer to this database technology as
"REDUCTION DATABASE...
September 9, 2015 at 2:12 pm
I stated to provide reasons for downsizing to SQL Server from Jet Engine 4.x.
Since Jet Engine 4.x is the more powerful of the two from what I can gather,
what advantages...
September 9, 2015 at 1:42 pm
Viewing 7 posts - 76 through 82 (of 82 total)