Viewing 15 posts - 4,231 through 4,245 (of 4,271 total)
Parameter mapping is on the input, ie passing variables TO the query, the next item down is result set, it maps output FROM the query to variables. You can...
July 1, 2009 at 9:10 am
What is your key structure on that table?
If no key then just chose a value that falls between the current 2nd and 3rd positions.
However, I would say ever...
July 1, 2009 at 9:07 am
GROUP BY Asset_ID, To_User, MAX(Change_Date)
Comes to mind.. You might have to put the home MAX(DATEADD.... logic in but I think this will work..
CEWII
July 1, 2009 at 8:23 am
I think there is a better way..
As a matter of fact I can think of two..
First way (best):
1. Build a table that contains the text values and the id of...
July 1, 2009 at 8:18 am
Although I hate to say it this way, it depends..
But first, it seems a simple inner join would more than suffice for what you want, just join the header to...
July 1, 2009 at 8:07 am
I too found it to be kind of sketchy in SSMS, where it was screwing me much more often than helping, I too shut it off. I had similar...
July 1, 2009 at 7:35 am
The data might not be, but if you have a column in the destiantion table that you are not populating during the data pump it can cause this. Is...
July 1, 2009 at 7:30 am
I think Ed is right on, there are almost no good reasons to try to upgrade master and msdb, with that said, there are probably things in those databases you...
July 1, 2009 at 7:22 am
Yikes!
I don't blame you for not wanting to administer another server, but like many things its a question of cost, is the maint/admin costs of the box acceptable in light...
July 1, 2009 at 7:19 am
That option ONLY works in BIDS, it has no effect during a run outside of BIDS.
As far as calling it from code, that has me stumped too, I...
July 1, 2009 at 7:15 am
I couldn't agree more, there is no reason to incur the overhead of a cursor, just adding the base table with a join on the keys should work great.
CEWII
June 30, 2009 at 9:48 pm
I still think his best bet is to trace it, then he can see exactly what is going on..
CEWII
June 30, 2009 at 9:46 pm
It is really not obvious until you understand it, then it is really a, "I can't believe I didn't see that.."
CEWII
June 30, 2009 at 9:42 pm
I have to admit, I like Phil's process..
CEWII
June 30, 2009 at 9:40 pm
I checked out the article in the other posters response and generally disagree.
As I see your question I see two parts, the first is definition, the field should be defined...
June 30, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,231 through 4,245 (of 4,271 total)