Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 183 total)
I think most everything built stock will return the virtual name. @@ServerName, ServerProperty(), etc will all return the virtual name. I think you may have to resort to...
March 20, 2009 at 9:48 am
I specify specific databases, and its possible that one does not exist anymore as we tooks some old applications offline. I will double check all the databases selected and...
March 18, 2009 at 1:28 pm
Curious what the reason is for wanting to limit the words in the index? Do you think you will get faster index results (not sure you will), trying to...
March 13, 2009 at 1:03 pm
I am not aware of any direct way to read log files with Reporting Services. RS uses data sources to access the data, so unless you can setup a...
February 20, 2009 at 8:45 am
If its always present and the same size use the right() function with the size of that RIGHT(column-name, 7) in your examples.
If its not the same size then use charindex()...
February 18, 2009 at 10:55 am
Depends on the definition of "not used." If you mean empty columns then you could look at using some queires based on the system tables like sys.columns. You...
February 4, 2009 at 1:32 pm
The transaction rolled forward/back should not be any issue. That is simply the dbcc command getting the database to stable state to perform its actions (or so is my...
January 16, 2009 at 8:04 am
And Lynn comes out of the shadows to win the debate! Ouch. 😛
January 15, 2009 at 9:54 am
No problem Jeff... I like a good debate! Its what makes the job fun and makes you rethink your basis of how you handle solutions to issues in the...
January 15, 2009 at 9:52 am
That is true. But it can work the other way as well. ISNULL keeps the original data type. So if it is 2 characters and you isnull(column(char(2),...
January 15, 2009 at 9:50 am
Haha... I agree that truely portable code is almost impossible to achieve. 🙂 But working in an environment with multiple systems we try to make our code as...
January 15, 2009 at 9:38 am
True... it is slightly (very slightly) faster. And in billions of rows it could make a difference. But is it wroth compliance of standards and advantages of functionality...
January 15, 2009 at 9:03 am
Can you do something as follows (Verify before you run this code in prod :))
...
January 15, 2009 at 8:37 am
Just as a note as well.. if you are going to end up processing millions upon millions rows as indicated make sure you look at working with subsets to keep...
January 15, 2009 at 8:31 am
The thing to really thinik about is not logical disk, but physical disk. If you have one physical hard drive and create two logical drives you will not really...
January 15, 2009 at 8:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 183 total)