Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 2,007 total)
If it’s Synchronous Mirroring it should be instantaneous (i.e. no fall behind)
The mirror server immediately writes the incoming log to disk, where it is held until it is applied to...
October 5, 2011 at 6:29 am
Congratulations Jeff for ‘Exceptional DBA of 2011’ award.
I recently joined SSC & exploring SQL Server by reading your (& other GURU’s) comments.
Thanks for your valuable contributions. Keep sharing your...
October 5, 2011 at 6:13 am
Would you mind trying open source solutions?
DBDesigner 4
October 5, 2011 at 5:56 am
overlooked the fact 'If DIFFERENTIAL and COPY_ONLY are used together, COPY_ONLY is ignored, and a differential backup is created.'
But differential backup / restore would be single operation on both the...
October 5, 2011 at 5:51 am
differential (copy only) backup & restore should also do but you need to schedule jobs on both the servers (same with log shipping).
October 5, 2011 at 5:40 am
Factors That Can Delay Log Truncation:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345414.aspx
Database mirroring requires that each log record remain active until the principal server instance receives notification from the mirror server instance that the...
October 5, 2011 at 5:28 am
Just to explain ghanshyam.kundu’s post (table names are creating confusion):
update table1 set table1.col1=table2.col1
from table1 t1 inner join table2 t2 on t1.id=t2.id
table1 – the table you want to update. In your...
October 5, 2011 at 4:31 am
I have restricted access to internet (Company's IT policy 😀 ). Would you mind summarizing it for us?
October 4, 2011 at 5:45 am
The rebuild operation can be minimally logged if the database recovery model is set to either bulk-logged or simple.
Choosing a Recovery Model for Index Operations:
October 4, 2011 at 3:54 am
If the files are set to grow automatically, then “Yes”.
Per MSDN:
If a backup operation overlaps with a file-management operation or shrink operation, a conflict occurs. Regardless of which of the...
October 4, 2011 at 3:41 am
I prefer manual file management than auto-management (auto-grow, auto-shrink, defrag etc.). The reason is simple ‘I (as DBA) know better when the database must grow / shrink’.
October 4, 2011 at 2:59 am
1)I'm using .net - is there a way I can configure schema name as a part of connection string.
Dev:: I am not sure on this but if you have separate...
October 4, 2011 at 2:50 am
If the data volume is huge, UNION will certainly kill the performance.
October 4, 2011 at 12:40 am
The solution in the practice exam is correct.
I am sorry for my previous post (I corrected it). Please go through following MSDN article.
Designing Partitions to Manage Subsets of Data:
October 3, 2011 at 7:44 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 2,007 total)