Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)
I got it wrong because I paid too much attention to the function and didn't pay any attention to the parameter value passed in :blush:
But I've definately seen this...
May 20, 2008 at 10:19 am
- the Table-valued functions need to materialize their entire recordset before being able to return anything, so they can quickly "swamp" the memory area.
This is true for T-SQL...
May 13, 2008 at 11:37 am
Because CLR assemblies are not compiled to machine language there is no problem when moving them between 32 and 64 bit. The assemblies will be JIT compiled by the runtime...
May 13, 2008 at 11:33 am
cs_troyk (5/13/2008)
Would be interesting to see how...
May 13, 2008 at 10:49 am
Matt,
Thanks for that article link. I seem to remember seeing a tally table at some point when I first started programming, but didn't understand it, moved on and forgot about...
May 13, 2008 at 10:30 am
I agree that a CLR split is probably faster than an XML split... heh... just about everything is faster than an XML split.
Yeah, comparing CLR w/ XML wasn't really the...
May 13, 2008 at 10:13 am
Splitting a string may be trivial in T-SQL but that doesn't mean it's the best tool for the job. The CLR is vastly faster for splitting strings the longer your...
May 13, 2008 at 8:59 am
You cannot use UI components from w/in the SQL CLR.
The CLR uses host protection attributes (HPAs) which declare information about what specific framework classes and methods do. This allows the...
May 1, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)