Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 107 total)

  • RE: creating a distribution agent via t-sql

    1. create the transactional pub via SSMS GUI

    2. create the transactional sub (with the same push/pull that you want) via SSMS GUI

    3. generate scripts for same

    4. edit and prettify scripts...

  • RE: SQL Server 2005 License for Replica?

    in SQL200x products replication is FREE (unlike competing vendors)

    exceptions

    1. if doing Oracle-SQL replication you would need SQL2005 Enterprise Edition

    2. SQL/Express and SQLCE can be subscribers (not publisher or distribution engines)

    BTW,...

  • RE: Bad Performance on SQL 2005 compared to SQL 2000

    can't check everything? must check everything? bug-free software? hmm !

    forgot to answer Berto's last question - yes you can replicate from SQL2005 to SQL2000

    there are some gotchas if trying to...

  • RE: Replication is extremely slow !

    the LogReader (LR) reads from the AppDb tranlog (.LDF) and writes to the distribution db

    if these App team changes are still going in, the supposition must be some blocking and/or...

  • RE: Bad Performance on SQL 2005 compared to SQL 2000

    Berto, you have said that there is a query that can max out your CPU for extended period. I am presuming this is in minority and that all other queries...

  • RE: Scale out Transactional Replication

    Barry raises good question ...

    simplistically there are these processes on the Distributor

    1. LogReader [reads from PUB.srcdb tranlog, and writes to DIST.distribution]

    2. Distribution Agent (DA) [reads from distribution, and writes to...

  • RE: Transactional Replication Failure

    1. local disks are fast

    2. repl does row-at-once (lotsa round trips)

    3. networks are slow

    4. people send huge # of rows in one transactions

    5. some subs are way over-indexed (but reporting...

  • RE: Merge Replication -Allowing SQL Server Manage Identity ranges and Sometimes the allocation is not working on the publisher

    1. using INT IDENTITY ... gives 2 ** 32 potential values (it's a lot!)

    2. having long network latencies can mean that small allocations can be eaten up too quickly and...

  • RE: Creating a test server

    I agree replication is wrong and backup(PROD)-restore(TEST) is correct, but consider ...

    1. the disk geometry on PROD (data=E:, tlog=F:, dumps=G:) may differ from TEST (data=tlog=D:)

    2. the maintplan on PROD probably...

  • RE: Distributor disconnected

    you should investigate what the problem is

    LogReader [reads from pub db and writes to distribution db]

    Distribution Agent (DA) [reads from distribution and applies to sub db]

    from what you have said,...

  • RE: replication without initialization

    1. most PROD db's will be Recovery=FULL, probably with Log-Shipping to Disaster Recovery (D/R)

    2. a 100% reload (500,000 x DELETE plus 500,000 INSERT) will be expensive

    3. transactional repl (or...

  • RE: waiting for a response from the server

    1. as you do I/U/D statements a db will incur fragmentation [akin to breathing]

    2. replication is chronological replay of what happened at pub on each sub

    -> hence you...

  • RE: monitor replication

    replication works great apart from user fiddling !

    left alone, the replication Distribution Agent (DA) plods along happily and replays I/U/D statements [via synthetic sprocs] and all is wonderful.

    But then a...

  • RE: Replication process when updating from a temporary table

    the replication Distribution Agent (DA) has to faithfully "replay" at the sub whatever happened on the pub. This means it has to do a BEGIN TRAN ... stuff ... COMMIT...

  • RE: replication doubt

    1. it IS necessary to have a PK for transactional/merge replication

    2. it is NOT necessary to have a PK for Snapshot repl

    as Lowell rightly said, the Distribution Agent (DA) needs...

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 107 total)