Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
I guess naming standards fall under the same type of conversation that religion, money and politics fall under. We all have our opinions and nobody is right, but noone has...
April 6, 2005 at 3:12 pm
So you change your name as you move from room to room. LOL. Thanks Adam.
April 6, 2005 at 3:11 pm
I totally agree with what you are saying about very rigid standards. When I develop a database, I try to use naming in a way that would be intuitive to the...
April 6, 2005 at 3:08 pm
"In the relatively rare case that there is this kind of conflict I will normally rename the fK column."
Do you find that to be an acceptable solution? The moment...
April 6, 2005 at 2:55 pm
I guess I just prefer my data name specifically. I agree with keeping column names short, but they have to be clear and descriptive as well.
April 6, 2005 at 2:51 pm
I do alias my fields most of the time. But if you follow what I said regarding primary and foreign keys, you are implying "name" in one table is related...
April 6, 2005 at 2:44 pm
Thanks Adam, I will remember that. LMAO!!!
April 6, 2005 at 2:40 pm
Regarding the "name" or "description" field. Let's say you have a field in 2 tables named "name". The tables are named item and customer. I have found it much easier to...
April 6, 2005 at 2:33 pm
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)