Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
datawiz (4/14/2011)
April 14, 2011 at 11:51 am
I hadn't seen your earlier post when I commented above ...
Based on previous comments, this is the layout I am considering:
2 disk - RAID1 - OS
4 disk - RAID10 -...
April 13, 2011 at 2:28 pm
Busy is all relative. Log is sequential writes which any drive can do without breaking a sweat.
Data IO patterns will vary but is almost always random. ...
April 13, 2011 at 12:26 pm
There is no hard and fast rule but generally speaking ram is cheap and SQL Server loves RAM.
Our department has two server pushing >1TB. The first has 32GB. ...
April 7, 2011 at 7:52 pm
clement.store (4/7/2011)
April 7, 2011 at 10:11 am
As a customer I would demand any hardware vendor indicating that RAID 10 is not viable to back that claim up with verifiable benchmarks.
Here is a benchmark done by a...
April 5, 2011 at 10:58 pm
Do you really need 4 drives devoted for logs? With only 12 drives to work with that seem prohibitively expensive. Logs are mainly sequential writes. Even a...
April 5, 2011 at 7:08 am
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)