Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 388 total)
WAIT A MINUTE! ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO DROP YOUR INDEX?
Not entirely sure what's going on, but it looks like your going to drop (have dropped) the primary key...
April 9, 2010 at 3:52 am
Sounds to me like this may be a "double hop" issue, where authentication is not working.
In short, if you're going from A to B to C (Delphi to SQLSvr1 to...
April 9, 2010 at 2:55 am
I assume he's talking about a variation on the following, which is what SQL Server will create for you, if you create your fks from a diagram for example (which...
February 26, 2010 at 7:57 am
Below is my CTE effort, which won't work on SQL2000, but which does consider multiple fkeys.
I'm not entirely sure what the 'standard' convention is, as it seems to depend on...
February 26, 2010 at 7:46 am
Chris,
A foreign key isn't necessarily between 1 field in each table. If you have a composite primary key made up of 4 fields, for example, then a foreign key...
February 26, 2010 at 7:11 am
Thanks for the script. 🙂
It's a good idea, but potentially you could get duplicates, where you have multiple foreign keys between the same 2 tables.
But those could easily be...
February 24, 2010 at 12:44 am
Michael Valentine Jones (2/9/2010)
I think it would cause intense fragmentation of the index if you inserted...
February 10, 2010 at 12:31 am
Thanks Jeff,
Yeah, I know that the sort order isn't guaranteed, even if the index is clustered. It's just pretty much always the case, and so can be handy. ...
February 8, 2010 at 5:49 am
Sorry to come in so late....this might have been useful a few posts ago.
...but I see yours is pretty much the same, Jeff.
February 8, 2010 at 5:41 am
I wouldn't have thought it would perform any sort operation i.e. it wouldn't re-sort your index just because it was ascending instead of descending. I assumed it would just...
February 5, 2010 at 9:08 am
I understand your point, but I would suggest that you could say the same about the data in the target audit tables. i.e. a privileged user would be able to...
December 11, 2009 at 9:34 am
Hi Lynn,
Thanks for that - it worked! (But I don't remember this being a requirement for a deterministic function!?)
I was then faced with the problem that my function was...
November 18, 2009 at 1:31 am
Ramon-218872 (10/29/2009)
I'm trying to use the code, because it's that I need, but I get the error:
Msg 7357, Level 16, State 2, Procedure sp_ConvProc2View, Line 27
Cannot process the...
October 29, 2009 at 9:39 am
Tom Garth (10/29/2009)
David McKinney (10/29/2009)
ruedifuchs (10/29/2009)
But since the stored procedure has to return a result set, what is the advantage over...
October 29, 2009 at 8:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 388 total)