Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
CELKO,
I'm learning a lot though this process, thinking much more carefully about how I should organize my CIs.
Dave
November 22, 2012 at 10:57 am
Hi Jeff. That's my whole question really. Is there a good way to fix this and is it worth trying to fix.
True using a UDF to generate the UUIDs will...
November 22, 2012 at 10:53 am
Jeff, there are zillions of lines of app code that have queries joining on and referencing the UUID.
November 21, 2012 at 6:46 pm
Hi Tom.
It's counter intuitive, but that is how SQL orders UniqueIdentifiers.
November 21, 2012 at 6:44 pm
Thanks for your help opc.three.
One last thing: I hate to leave less than optimal code out there for posterity so here is my last, optimized function with all string...
November 21, 2012 at 11:40 am
Our web-based app exposes these IDs in the URL. Although their is additional security checking when executing queries based on the passed in URL UUID, in our shop it...
November 21, 2012 at 11:22 am
opc.three:
Currently we have an integer identity, so I imagine I could draw a line in the sand and say all records with an identity of < X go to partition...
November 20, 2012 at 11:09 am
Thanks for all the comments. I have one more idea for addressing this. I'm thinking about partitioning my table. Everything that has already been created with the...
November 19, 2012 at 5:10 pm
Hi opc.three. Thanks for the reply.
Yeah, for the most part the UUIDs are generated in the app layer, though there is some default constraints in the dB.
As luck would...
November 16, 2012 at 12:10 pm
Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)