Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 113 total)
Paul,
Sorry for the late response.
That - is brilliant. Genious thinking. Thank you ever so much. I never thought of it quite like that.
I am not 100% sure...
February 1, 2012 at 4:50 am
However the question was still wrong as you still dont reference another column. You reference a UDF.
SQL Kiwi (1/31/2012)
Hugo Kornelis (1/31/2012)
February 1, 2012 at 1:12 am
Nakul Vachhrajani (1/31/2012)
3. A hint overrides a SET option
4. A database option overrides an instance option and a...
February 1, 2012 at 1:08 am
I must admit i dont like the questions which contain trickery.
However on the flip side - its interesting to see how people have got round these limitations. ...
January 31, 2012 at 2:07 am
Ok - for the read uncommited (my first issue) i was planning on the stored procs that read the data for the reports to set it in there.
Dan
January 30, 2012 at 9:14 am
Ashish,
Sorry for which of my two scenarios are you sugguesting using nolock?
Thanks for your help
Dan
January 30, 2012 at 4:45 am
Thanks for all suggestions.
Unfortunately no i cant change front end. Only thing i have a chance to do is change what people type in - and you know how...
January 6, 2012 at 9:41 am
Hi,
If you read the data of a table that you have made changes to - you will see the changes even if they have not been committed.
To highlight this i...
December 19, 2011 at 6:55 am
paul.knibbs (12/16/2011)
danielfountain (12/16/2011)
If rebuilding the indexes can cause the file to grow - why not rebuild the indexes then shrinkfile afterwards?
Because doing a shrink will fragment the indexes again, thus...
December 16, 2011 at 2:10 am
Good article - quick question though.
If rebuilding the indexes can cause the file to grow - why not rebuild the indexes then shrinkfile afterwards?
Dan
December 16, 2011 at 2:00 am
If anyone is interested - the only way i could get rid of them was via the code.
Unless anyone has a better way? odd.
TIA
Dan
December 14, 2011 at 4:05 am
The plot thickens.
If i do this
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1)
or this
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1,0)
The problem goes away. However if i do this
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1,101)
or
CONVERT(DATETIME, PAD.AdditionalDetail1,100)
It still errors.
The field has dates that ares...
November 11, 2011 at 9:59 am
Doh Sorry i worked it out. I didnt need the partition.
November 10, 2011 at 3:41 am
Sad i know but i was actually quite pleased to have got the right answer on a multi choice with such a low percentage of right answers. I had...
November 9, 2011 at 6:06 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 113 total)