Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 478 total)
I must admit its a tricky one, the cost of downtime because you tried to have some money on the hardware would be difficult to explain to your manager on...
January 1, 2002 at 5:39 pm
Hi Steve
Yep, just submitted it. Funny enough, a lot of SS developers seem to think that identities for EVERY table is a great solution because it means less coding...
January 1, 2002 at 2:42 am
Hi there
I use this before running my data migration scripts for the bazillionth time...
SELECT 'DBCC CHECKIDENT (' + o.[name] + ', RESEED, 1)'
FROM syscolumns c
INNER JOIN sysobjects o ON o.[Id]...
December 30, 2001 at 7:53 pm
Hi
I take the following approach:
a) P-keys are mandatory (dont cluster them unless they are cluster friendly and you will get the maximum benefit from them as its 1 per...
December 30, 2001 at 7:02 pm
Hi all
Having come from the world of Oracle, SQL*Server 7 and 2k has been very impressive indeed. Under NT, I firmly believe SQL*Server is the only choice as Ive...
December 30, 2001 at 6:35 pm
Hi there
Coming form an Oracle world, UDF's are very restrictive and tend to be a half cocked effort. I have this sneaking feeling that MS is not expending much...
December 19, 2001 at 6:53 pm
I use it quite a bit and have noticed a small benefit. I have a range of security lookup tables etc and various reference data tables that I pin...
December 6, 2001 at 6:22 pm
All I can say is... "dont make your life harder that it needs to be!"
Anyone who thinks coding t-sql, dmo, pouring over scripts manually is FUN and its necessary to...
December 4, 2001 at 5:09 pm
Hi all
Good article Steve. I come from the Oracle world where a decent GUI was something i longed for over many years (for the record, Oracle enterprise manager and...
December 4, 2001 at 8:55 am
Steve
Thanks steve, I swear I played around with this and didnt seem to pick up everything.
I will give it another burl.
Cheers
Chris
December 3, 2001 at 6:28 pm
Hi
Are you sure its doing incremental updates? have you got a timestamp column?
if not then incrementals will not work. On my server the disks get thrashed and CPU's...
December 3, 2001 at 2:41 am
Hi guys
We have the following in prod:
internet
|
firewall
|
ssl box
|
webserver (163.232.x)
|---------------domain controller (163.232.x)
sqlserver (10.10.10.3 private network)
|
disk-farm
we run a totally seperate domain for our prod environment, away from
the existing domain...
November 26, 2001 at 11:43 pm
Steve
Hi Steve, I ment something like this:
truncate table infile_list
set @v_commandline = 'dir /B ' + @v_processeddest + '*.unl'
insert into infile_list
exec @result = master..xp_cmdshell @v_commandline
Where ive sent the output of the...
November 25, 2001 at 5:10 pm
Hi
Although all possible via DTS, I tend not to use it as a "solution for anything that needs to be scheduled", although this will (perhaps) slowly change over time. ...
November 20, 2001 at 6:04 am
1000 rows is not only a limitation but a bug as far as im concerned 🙂
any ideas on another way to expose AD via views to app users?
November 12, 2001 at 3:26 am
Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 478 total)