Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 140 total)
I run a quick test in QA and it looks like a single derived table is faster.
In my test db neither family nor givennames are indexed. It also has a...
September 5, 2005 at 3:50 am
Cool I'll have to test that. I would have assumed otherwise.
I would have assumed the derived table would use an index seek to get the records and then all the...
September 4, 2005 at 2:48 pm
I think its what makes sqlservercentral.com such a great forum. Everybody is so willing to debate all aspects of a problem.
I have rarely had to wait more the...
September 4, 2005 at 1:05 pm
Chris, Is the union faster then using a CASE in the derived table?
select foo.FullName from
(Select case when lname like 'A%' then lname + ', ' + fName when fName...
September 4, 2005 at 12:59 pm
What a funny thread.
Sure there are plenty of ways to deal with it and all depend on what the needs and environemnt are.
If somebody asks a formating question one can...
September 4, 2005 at 5:55 am
granted but if there are many clients (types) and the formating wants to be enforced enterprise wide...
September 2, 2005 at 3:35 pm
Beautiful!
I use case statements but I hadn't thought of using them that way, equal to itself...I can hardly wait to see if it works as expected!
September 2, 2005 at 3:02 pm
What datatype is the field? Maybe you should simply set it to 'money'
September 2, 2005 at 3:00 pm
Thanks for that MidwestDBA. I think that encourages me enough to at least do an experiment using the whole dataset. I'll configuring it with partitioning first and run some queries...
August 23, 2005 at 12:59 pm
Weird I just wrote about 5 paragraphs but you are all saved from reading it all because I hit post and it all dissappeared. So this time just the facts.
~50gb...
August 19, 2005 at 2:37 pm
Almost all the queries include a date range so if it coould be a calculated constraint like
tbl1: date dateadd(m,-12,getdate())
Then that what would...
August 19, 2005 at 11:42 am
Thanks for the advice, I think I will avoid the partitioning. I really don't need the overhead and the benefits are iffy compares to the boost I'll get from teh...
August 18, 2005 at 1:38 pm
I setup this tool but I was after more frequent collection of performance counters for overall sytem health (System, ASP, etc). I think I set it for hourly collection...
March 28, 2005 at 8:25 am
Thanks guys, I just double checked and the example I was working from online was NOT from MS SQL Doh!
I always have a hard time remembering the syntax for an...
March 8, 2005 at 11:39 am
I agree that your associated (User/Note) table is the way to go.
If each note is being assigned to a large number of users, perhaps a group system could...
March 8, 2005 at 11:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 140 total)