Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)

  • Reply To: SQL replication - is there a way to start from current data?

    also @sphite

    when replication failed for the reason you status above "Someone accidentally ran the script on the Destination server - which added the column" you should have been able to...

  • Reply To: SQL replication - is there a way to start from current data?

    If you're confident that your subscriber has the data you need, you can define your subscription using

    @sync_type = N'replication support only' instead of @sync_type = N'automatic'.

    and run your snapshot (it...

  • RE: SQL SERVER 2005 Transaction Replication Debugging

    You can find the exact command having issues by running this:

    exec sp_BrowseReplCmds '0x00029F9B000001F0004E00000000','0x00029F9B000001F0004E00000000'

    against your distribution database.

    This will return all commands in that transactionID and you would then look for...

  • RE: Block windows groups

    My experience is that "ALTER LOGIN...DISABLE" is for SQL Standard accounts

    while "ALTER LOGIN...DENY" is for Windows accounts..

    one option that may work for you too- is to disable remote access (via...

  • RE: How do I allow users to see objects in object explorer? (SQL2005)

    bump...

    are there no smart people out there who know the answer 😛

  • RE: @@Servername

    since the serverid <> 0 it's considered a "remote" server.

    for @@servername to return properly- you'll need to drop and add as stated earlier:

    If you look up sys.servers in BOL-...

  • RE: @@Servername

    I've seen this before- I'd bet your server isn't registered as "local"

    Try selecting from master.Sys.servers- (select * from master.sys.servers)

    you're local servername should be server_id= 0

    if it's not- I think you...

  • RE: SQL Sever Disaster Recovery idea

    Hi-

    First I want to make sure I'm understanding... Your DR Server will be the same computername and Service Account??

    We've done exactly that process a number of times on SQL 2000,...

  • RE: Large distribution database

    It's been awhile since I logged this, and actually it's been resolved for awhile too, but I thought I'd add the resolution.

    It turned out that I DID have one anonymous...

  • RE: Distribution server replication

    I wonder if you could:

    Name the new server the same as the old server (off the network until swap time)

    configure distribution

    copy the mdf and ldf files and attach

    [Note-- I haven't...

  • RE: Large distribution database

    hmm- this isn't making sense based upon my analysis to date, but yesterday I changed the retention to 13 days rather than the 14 it was set for and dropped...

  • RE: Large distribution database

    no apology needed-- You're helping 🙂

    Your assumption is correct-

    if I look at the history and identify a xact_seqno, then run sp_browsereplcmds for it-- it's still there

    I'm mostly concerned with...

  • RE: Large distribution database

    yes- (See the 1st msg in the thread)

    It's typically running from 50 minutes to 2 hours.

    I started tracking the size of MSrepl_commands on 10/14

    (running sp_spaceused MSrepl_commands) each time the...

  • RE: Large distribution database

    well- looking at all the publications (after forcing synchs) we have none pending.

    I'll see if I can drill down to some particulars via xact_seqno to determine from there.

    Any more thoughts...

  • RE: Large distribution database

    Hmm. That's a mighty good question! How does one tell?

    Unfortunately, we don't have vanilla replication table => table... We've got some pretty ugly custom stored procedures - sometimes updating a...

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)