Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 331 total)
If you do Just a select with a where clause of one of the values that you know should not have duplicates. Do you get more than one record?
June 7, 2011 at 11:37 am
Are you positive that they are duplicates if any of the columns have anything different leading or falling zeros, spaces could make sql server see the row as unique.
June 7, 2011 at 11:20 am
Why don't you just download SQL Server Express to get your hands dirty first before spending $$.
http://www.microsoft.com/express/Database/InstallOptions.aspx
June 7, 2011 at 10:48 am
They are right it is much easier to manage your system in full recovery model. If your wanting to keep your hands out as much as possible you can do...
June 7, 2011 at 10:40 am
Hey appreciate that sometimes all you need is a second pair of eyes!
June 2, 2011 at 10:41 am
rfr.ferrari
No problem on performance this is for High availiability being able to recover with low or no loss of work time. In the case of hardware failure active/active failover in...
June 1, 2011 at 7:56 am
WayneS or SQLRNNR
Not sure of that, But I read the licensing agreement from Microsoft and they consider it to be part of a failover cluster in my case of active/active...
May 31, 2011 at 10:55 am
Thanks for all of your replies! I have my answer: Active/Active would be necessary for my clustering needs.
May 31, 2011 at 8:27 am
WayneS
So your saying if I did a 2 node failover and did log shipping that would be considered a 3 node cluster by microsoft?
May 31, 2011 at 6:26 am
WayneS
Thanks, I was trying to set up where I have 3 sql servers on standard edition so that I have a failover and can log shipfrom node 2 with out...
May 27, 2011 at 12:01 pm
Elliott
With that said if node one is active and node two is active and node 2 is the fail over can I use the node 2 for log shipping...
May 27, 2011 at 11:40 am
WayneS
So if active/active does not have the same resource how is the sql server able to failover with ur copy of production db?
May 27, 2011 at 10:59 am
Hey GSquared
I thought spreading out the work load is called load balancing and SQL server does not support true load balancing?
May 27, 2011 at 10:07 am
Thanks LutzM thats what I was looking for.
March 24, 2011 at 1:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 331 total)