Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 110 total)
complete guess .. but perhaps you should not use isnull with sum. Maybe you could put the results of isnull in a variable instead and use sum that way.
August 24, 2008 at 11:37 pm
ok charshman, but what if I have created the logins and run your sync script and then I want to restore the database again from the same source db. I...
August 19, 2008 at 5:23 pm
cool.. Just a couple of questions about the migration
should I only have to transfer the logins once using this method because once the sids are in sync If I...
August 18, 2008 at 11:36 pm
Hope you don't find my explanation too dry...
I am transfering a 2000 db to 2005. I haven't been given a test environment to work with. I am migrating by restore...
August 18, 2008 at 4:55 pm
thanks guys - is there any issue setting the model back to simple again when it is in full recovery model?
August 17, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Sorry Jack.. I don't understand because I believe the max memory is set to the default (2TBs) which that counter is not showing for any of those instances.
August 14, 2008 at 5:23 pm
hehe.. you had me freakin out there for a minute - I'm glad Gail is right cos I would be in all sorts of trouble!
August 14, 2008 at 4:54 pm
why is the max set so high as a default (2147483647 MB)? If I am getting paging problem would that be because this is too high?
August 14, 2008 at 3:21 am
ok maybe that was a silly question. I would like to try a 1 more.
can you replicate a read only subscriber?
August 9, 2008 at 10:25 pm
hi Lenny,
I have been thinking about that too. Can I ask how does you database run with that, what type of hardware do you use?how big is you db (i.e...
August 6, 2008 at 10:39 pm
Two questions
what the current patch level for sql server?
Can I patch 1 instance without effecting another instance - e.g. SP2 is saying SQL Browser is locked. I will need...
August 4, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Ok.. I will try to attack this from another viewpoint. My SQL server 2000 box say I am using Latin1_General_CI_AS server collation. I may be wrong but because this...
August 2, 2008 at 9:10 pm
thanks. I think I have the right collation for my 2005 server - SQL_Latin1_General_CP437_CI_AS. SQL Server 2000 say Latin1_General_CI_AS though. Is this ok? What is the best way...
July 31, 2008 at 8:00 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 110 total)