Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 110 total)
complete guess .. but perhaps you should not use isnull with sum. Maybe you could put the results of isnull in a variable instead and use sum that way.
August 24, 2008 at 11:37 pm
ok charshman, but what if I have created the logins and run your sync script and then I want to restore the database again from the same source db. I...
August 19, 2008 at 5:23 pm
cool.. Just a couple of questions about the migration
should I only have to transfer the logins once using this method because once the sids are in sync If I...
August 18, 2008 at 11:36 pm
Hope you don't find my explanation too dry...
I am transfering a 2000 db to 2005. I haven't been given a test environment to work with. I am migrating by restore...
August 18, 2008 at 4:55 pm
thanks guys - is there any issue setting the model back to simple again when it is in full recovery model?
August 17, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Sorry Jack.. I don't understand because I believe the max memory is set to the default (2TBs) which that counter is not showing for any of those instances.
August 14, 2008 at 5:23 pm
hehe.. you had me freakin out there for a minute - I'm glad Gail is right cos I would be in all sorts of trouble!
August 14, 2008 at 4:54 pm
why is the max set so high as a default (2147483647 MB)? If I am getting paging problem would that be because this is too high?
August 14, 2008 at 3:21 am
ok maybe that was a silly question. I would like to try a 1 more.
can you replicate a read only subscriber?
August 9, 2008 at 10:25 pm
hi Lenny,
I have been thinking about that too. Can I ask how does you database run with that, what type of hardware do you use?how big is you db (i.e...
August 6, 2008 at 10:39 pm
Two questions
what the current patch level for sql server?
Can I patch 1 instance without effecting another instance - e.g. SP2 is saying SQL Browser is locked. I will need...
August 4, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Ok.. I will try to attack this from another viewpoint. My SQL server 2000 box say I am using Latin1_General_CI_AS server collation. I may be wrong but because this...
August 2, 2008 at 9:10 pm
thanks. I think I have the right collation for my 2005 server - SQL_Latin1_General_CP437_CI_AS. SQL Server 2000 say Latin1_General_CI_AS though. Is this ok? What is the best way...
July 31, 2008 at 8:00 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 110 total)
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy