Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

  • RE: Why calculated fields?

    Thanks Lowell

    My thoughts almost exactly. I too would use a calculated field if it was required for an Index, but 90% of the time a bit of further analysis can...

  • RE: Decoupling in Relational Databases

    OK Gaz - maybe the language was a bit intemperate. But I did feel that some of the comments were a little dismissive. We were ALL 'newbies' once - making...

  • RE: Decoupling in Relational Databases

    Give the guy a break - this is aimed at newbies.

    Right - it is a no-brainer for us grizzled database developers. I can add a little constructive criticism though Tim....

  • RE: Overusing Identities

    When I was a newbie to DB development (from a programmeer background) I liberally spread IDENTITY columns as PK. Simpler for me I thought and easier for the other developers.

    Now...

  • RE: Timing is Everything

    Even for our local setup here in the UK it makes sense for most of our systems to use UTC (and I STILL think of it as GMT!). A lot...

  • RE: We'll go no more a' tibbling

    The voice of sweet reason Steve!

    Bill

  • RE: We'll go no more a' tibbling

    James Stover (1/25/2010)


    I would rather a table named tblCustomer than one named A72GZF (or something equally nonsensical).

    So you've worked with Financial systems with 'Dynamic Table Creation' as well? Didn't...

  • RE: We'll go no more a' tibbling

    Gail

    I agree with you wholeheartedly. The only concession I would make would be UPPER CASE for table names - but that is more a matter of style and preference rather...

  • RE: We'll go no more a' tibbling

    Hi all.

    I'm one of those developers that write front ends to databases, and usually end up doing the database design as well.

    I used to code in VB and...

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)