Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
Thanks Dan. I have not had enough time to implement and test this suggestion . . but I will soon.
I did not realise that to lock a col it...
November 13, 2002 at 11:21 pm
Thanks for your suggestions Dan. Andy's suggestions are not really constructive... slowing down the sp is not an option (we already have timeouts occurring), and of course the app...
November 5, 2002 at 4:22 pm
C'mon guys. You can do better than that. Perhaps you misunderstood? I'll rephrase.
If I use a script for making changes to all db's (using cursor of sysdatabases),...
April 3, 2002 at 10:06 pm
Yes, I had planned to use a 'load on demand' type approach. The number of levels I load initially would depend upon volume of data. Remainder loaded as...
February 13, 2002 at 7:03 pm
Much faster than EM.
Also Query Analyser gets blocked by EM if it is currently in the midst of dropping down the list (quite annoying!).
Its looking like I may...
January 28, 2002 at 9:27 pm
PS. Above is slow in EM on server itself. I thought hardware insufficient as they have up to 100 concurrent users (off an intranet app).
January 28, 2002 at 8:38 pm
'Auto Close' did not really help issue.
Master is included in standard maintenance job.
Any other ideas??
January 28, 2002 at 7:42 pm
Thanks - 'Auto Close' was set to true. I'll let you know if the speed is improved.
January 16, 2002 at 8:27 pm
Ignore my problem above -
I found that it was the DRIDefault that I had set for the column. This must be removed before the column is removed.
September 11, 2001 at 1:17 am
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)