Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 562 total)
ScottPletcher (1/31/2013)
January 31, 2013 at 10:05 am
ScottPletcher (1/29/2013)
You may or may not need partitioning.But you absolutely need to determine the proper clustered index for the table.
I totally agree that a clustered index will help performance in...
January 31, 2013 at 2:51 am
GilaMonster (1/29/2013)
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/database-administration/gail-shaws-sql-server-howlers/
Thank you Gail for the link.
From the link:
'summary would be: don't change or implement anything without research and without knowing what it's going to affect. '
My quest at the...
January 31, 2013 at 2:07 am
siggemannen (1/28/2013)
INSERT INTO T(...)
SELECT t.a, t.b, 1
FROM sometable t
UNION
SELECT -t.a, t.b, 1
FROM sometable t
, both "sides" of union will retrieve...
January 29, 2013 at 10:02 am
GilaMonster (1/24/2013)
ben.brugman (1/24/2013)
I'd personally ignore PLE during CheckDB execution. Because it reads the entire database and because it marks pages brought in as 'disfavoured', meaning they'll be the first to...
January 24, 2013 at 9:52 am
Bhuvnesh (1/22/2013)
ben.brugman (1/22/2013)
Any suggestions how to catch the processes which cause the drop in PLE ?
it means you have buffer cache issue and IO contentions
see these links
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/buck_woody/archive/2010/06/29/the-windows-page-file-and-sql-server.aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654/en-us
and...
January 24, 2013 at 8:51 am
GilaMonster (1/22/2013)
ben.brugman (1/22/2013)
CheckDB effectively destroys the cache. (Why?).
Because it reads every single allocated page in the database and, like all other operations, reads them through the buffer pool. Unless you...
January 24, 2013 at 8:40 am
mickyT (1/21/2013)
January 24, 2013 at 5:51 am
Alexander Suprun (1/22/2013)
ben.brugman (1/22/2013)
I do not think normal disk IO...
January 24, 2013 at 4:58 am
Additional, we now saw the PLE drop from a few thousand to 7 within the 30 second time frame.
Size of the cache at that moment was 8 Gb.
This means that...
January 22, 2013 at 10:07 am
Because off another thread I thougth about this puzzle.
Because the puzzle is solved mainly using a lot of REPLACE functions.
Analytical I had allready determined that there would never be a...
January 21, 2013 at 1:35 am
Hello,
Take the advise of Gail Shaw (Gilamonster) seriously.
Read the article.
Very probably setting your database to simple en regulary make backups will work for your requirements.
(Steps 1/2/3 in my previous post).
Simple...
January 20, 2013 at 4:59 am
purushottam2 (1/19/2013)
Thanks for your promptness,
Only 20 users are using my application, and there is no frequently use of database interaction. And this log file increased up to 96 GB...
January 19, 2013 at 5:05 am
Hello I am going offline, but want to give some help.
So I am going to assume that you have a maintenance window where NOBODY is using the database.
1. Make a...
January 19, 2013 at 4:53 am
My assumption is that the log file has the size it has because of maintenance actions. This could be scripts you have run or for example ONLINE clustering.
First question is,...
January 19, 2013 at 4:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 562 total)