Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
Yes,It is correct,
but before using IDENT_CURRENT,I have exclusively lock the table,So if there is already an exclusive lock on that table,the second process will wait,until the exclusive lock has been...
June 10, 2009 at 12:27 pm
Sorry I forgot to say that @NumberOfIDsInBlock is input parameter, and I had considered 10 in my example(I forgot to use 10 instead of @NumberOfIDsInBlock in my sample).My main...
June 10, 2009 at 10:26 am
Guys,
Thanks a lot for your replys.I have done the same thing ,but this does not work.
Here is senario,in my "operation section" I am giving block of ID's to different Objects.Yesterday...
June 10, 2009 at 9:10 am
Thanks.for your reply,but my question is:Is this a kind of bug for SQL SERVER 2008,Because as I said the same transaction did not fail in SQL SERVER 2005?
April 14, 2009 at 9:47 am
Here is sample data that I have in log file:
03/04/2009 08:01:15:215 Create Session: 011.202.111.123, 502184, ed5cb1c53cdd6fa2c19a2e84c493te0c3e09d731603/04/2009 08:01:15:324 New page access: 011.202.111.123, 0,...
April 6, 2009 at 10:12 am
Thanks alot for your reply,Even when I added Flat file connection instead of Flat File Data source,still I have the same issue.Instead of recognizeing all columns(6 columns) .I have only...
April 6, 2009 at 9:46 am
Here is the result of DBCC ShowConfig,By considering Scan Density,Logical Fragmentation,Page Density, Should I do DBCC IndexDefrag or DBCC ReIndex?Cause Of the size of Database(which is pretty big) ,should I...
October 20, 2008 at 5:22 pm
I have done DBCC ShowConfig on that table and Scan Density it about 77% and I do not have any maintenance plan for rebuilding the index on this table.Should I...
October 20, 2008 at 11:51 am
Thanks for your response,
but unfortunately it didn't work.
July 28, 2008 at 10:37 am
yes it has IIS,.NET FrmaeWork 2.0 and SQL SERVER 2005 Developer Edition on windows 20000
July 26, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)