Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
from the BOL looks like its supported. Did you try it ?
December 10, 2009 at 7:12 am
don't need to change the the umber , its for internal microsoft use only.
if you look down the script for that entry the number has already been changed for you
July 16, 2009 at 12:10 pm
hyper-v with sql server 2005 on a windows 2008.its now supported by Microsoft
July 16, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Elliot , its not a question of being paranoid or that the structure of the restore may be corrupt. Its more about complying with the sql server checksum page...
July 3, 2009 at 11:59 am
thanks gail , that makes sense , i assume the bit about forcing the checksum on all the pages by creating the clustered index where not present and re-
building...
July 3, 2009 at 9:18 am
Yes , just re-booted the sql server instance, i did not re-boot the windows server
June 12, 2009 at 4:52 pm
ok , the server in question was a production server for us, i rebooted the sql server on the windows server around 10pm when we have nothing running on...
June 7, 2009 at 10:20 am
Got exactly the same issue, don't understand why it would go tiz like that. I've checked the plan databases via checkdb etc and backed up manually using the verify option....
June 4, 2009 at 3:57 am
thank u
January 21, 2009 at 4:12 pm
actually its one i inherited , I'm thinking about changing it to a standby but wanted to know if i could do it without changing the log shipping ...
January 19, 2009 at 7:23 am
thanks ....
December 29, 2008 at 4:39 am
thank you ...
December 17, 2008 at 9:03 am
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)