Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
Hey guys.
We have this disk servicing only one database (logs and data). And it's this disk that goes out of scale randomly (not very often)
We have a few...
August 30, 2017 at 9:44 am
Thanks a lot for your reply 🙂
I've been testing it, and it's working as expected 🙂 When there is pending IO, this query will get you information about it.
March 7, 2017 at 5:49 am
So I guess all the following errors are related:
This failure occured while attempting to connect to the Failover server
This failure occured while attempting to connect to the Principle server
And a...
June 5, 2014 at 2:18 am
mtillman-921105 (3/7/2012)
agustingarzon (3/6/2012)
mtillman-921105 (3/6/2012)
But, as sort of a hybrid approach, if you could at least provide a skeleton of the tables and...
March 7, 2012 at 11:42 am
mtillman-921105 (3/6/2012)
But, as sort of a hybrid approach, if you could at least provide a skeleton of the tables and add customizable...
March 6, 2012 at 5:38 pm
Honored with your suggestion, Jeff 😉
Thanks guys, I thought there would some difficulties crossing the database boundaries but with your suggestions it seems that this could work seamlessly.
Best regards,...
March 4, 2012 at 11:20 am
Chrissy321, I'm reviewing your suggestion now.
LutzM: I meant what would be your suggestion SQL wise, e.g. using the same database, using a schema, a second database, or a third approach....
March 1, 2012 at 6:59 am
Both databases would be on the same SQL Server instance, in case I forgot to mention :unsure:
February 29, 2012 at 12:47 pm
guerillaunit: Will investigate the linked server suggestion. Option 3 would be the best if we were able to join to the primary database.
LutzM: What we would be offering would be...
February 29, 2012 at 12:44 pm
bleh...
it seems all the cool features require the Enterprise Edition of Sql Server :^s
July 7, 2011 at 5:25 pm
Guys I really appreciate your suggestions and comments. You get me going in the right directions really quick.
I'll try Craig's suggestion first, to see if I can gain some milliseconds...
June 1, 2011 at 11:00 am
It's just a naming convention, there are tables named like
WILC.Property.LAND
and tables named like
Property.LAND
May 31, 2011 at 5:07 pm
I'm attaching the actual exec plan and the view def, hehehe go nuts !
What do you mean with un-3part named tables ? All the tables are in the same database.
So...
May 31, 2011 at 5:04 pm
Each of the tables have more or less columns, with different names.
The UNION ALL puts them all together in one place, the data types and the meaning is the same.
I...
May 31, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Barry, Paul, Jeff, Will, thanks a lot for your participation. I hope to get you that involved in future threads, hopefuly not that often 🙂
Kind regards, Agustin
March 4, 2010 at 7:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)