Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 201 total)
i'm not ignoring the answers. I specifically take copy_only backups because I don't want to interfere with log backups! I think there's some wires crossed here.
November 25, 2011 at 4:04 am
I don't get it. Maybe my brain's given up with it being Friday.
We take a regular full database backup every day at 10pm. Throughout the day, we take...
November 25, 2011 at 3:59 am
cool - that's the answer I was looking for. Cheers,
November 25, 2011 at 3:41 am
george sibbald (11/25/2011)
Note just in case - you only...
November 25, 2011 at 3:38 am
on my sandpit database it looks to be. I'll have to wait for the app support team to tell me how much trade data I've inadvertently deleted before celebrating...
November 16, 2011 at 6:56 am
let someone else run it and pretend you never had anything to do with it?
November 16, 2011 at 6:38 am
Hi,
Point taken about batch size - i'll change this.
So, I've come up with this. How's it look? Anything stand out as being rubbish? It seems to go...
November 16, 2011 at 5:53 am
Hi,
This is one of many attempts... It generates valid SQL okay, but it doesn't seem (based on the printed output) to be looping through the table until all qualifying records...
November 16, 2011 at 5:24 am
sjimmo (11/1/2011)
I have gone back and read this entire thread. At times I fond it to be humerous. Not one has mentioned the templates that are available...
November 2, 2011 at 4:18 am
We allow users to access the database through the designated application, for which they are in an AD group with limited permissions, but we don't want those same users accessing...
November 2, 2011 at 3:41 am
November 2, 2011 at 3:35 am
Actually, just figured it out. SQL Server's picking up the connection as 'Microsoft Data Access Components'. Our login trigger's screening applications like '%ACCESS%'...
thanks for looking.. 😀
November 2, 2011 at 3:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 201 total)