[font="Verdana"]

Robert Davis (5/6/2010)

---

You get the MCTS if you pass any exam. It doesn't have to exam 431. However, I agree that 431 is probably the best choice to start with....

[font="Verdana"]

but sorry, is this document's pre-requisites are correct and updated. Or your said one?

Thanks

[/font]

[font="Verdana"]

Eralper (5/5/2010)

---

Hello Mike,

Passing 70-431 is enough to complete requirements for MCTS : SQL Server 2005 certification

And completing other two exams (443 and 444) on top of 431 will earn you...

[font="Verdana"]Hey,

There is missing any concrete example "Not Concrete Programming :hehe: " to get rid of problem "Data could not be imported because text was truncated or characters do not...

[font="Verdana"]Please add 1 more vote to...

[font="Verdana"]Goodish, at least one of the requirements for QOD is fulfilled in this question statement, i.e to include the Version # of SQL.

Although it was obligatory for this question...

[font="Verdana"]humm.. ! late in this thread, but .. with interesting question.

I have witnessed all 70-432 VS 70-433 and similarly 73-450 VS 70-451

but i am interested in all.. !! :w00t:

any suggestion...

[font="Verdana"]its English version please? ..... just joking !! 😀

Nice Work[/font]

[font="Verdana"]

Landy_Ed (4/23/2010)

---

Thing to bear in mind with this is the new table is written to the default filegroup, does not recreate the indexes and reseeds any identity specification back to...

Good work!

but you seems to use extra(not required) parenthesis. might be good, but affected readability a bit. (just general comments not to take it serious).

2ndly, the code segment

Convert(real(256), MAX(u.backup_size), 101),'NA'))/1024)/1024

may...

[font="Verdana"]

Hugo Kornelis (4/22/2010)

---

Ian Elliott (4/22/2010)

---

I don't think it's hard to write the perfect question if it's just given a little though on the basics e.g. test the question and answers...

[font="Verdana"]

Ninja's_RGR'us (4/22/2010)

---

Hugo Kornelis (4/22/2010)

---

Good question. Not sure why it's worth 2 points; knowing that TRUNCATE can be rolled back should be elementary knowledge.

Abrar Ahmad_ (4/22/2010)

---

[font="Verdana"]Goodish, easy hunt. but for the...

[font="Verdana"]

kaspencer (4/22/2010)

---

The insert statement has a syntax that is unnacptable to SQL Server 2005. So why wasn't it stated as being compatible with SQL Server 2008 and later only?

We should...

[font="Verdana"]Goodish, easy hunt. but for the only SQL Server 2008 users.:-D

It means its good to be updated. Cool ... :hehe:

[/font]

[font="Verdana"]

Hugo Kornelis (4/21/2010)

---

Good, clean question, Ron. Nice work!

The question...