Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 622 total)
Just my 2 cents worth..
I agree with the other posters, you cannot feasibly use 5M rows in a web page efficiently, unless you are consuming that using some web scraping...
March 21, 2012 at 7:22 am
OK, I see where the confusion has arisen,
ProcessTask:WriteToLog(Start) and ProcessTask:WriteToLog(End) would be the same object with two process flow arrows into it. The writing of the log would happen...
February 29, 2012 at 1:59 pm
I want one PT called multiple times. This way if I need to change it's configuration I only have to do it once.
Maybe I am approaching this the wrong...
February 29, 2012 at 1:35 pm
No.., maybe I diodn't explain it clearly enough.
I can write the Process task to build the argument string from variables, What I was struggling to do was to define...
February 29, 2012 at 12:28 pm
The problem with that is that every tme you make changes to the script in DEV you have to modify it again once it has passed UAT so that you...
February 29, 2012 at 12:23 pm
Ermmm,
By adding a Process Task object to the start and end of the process Flow??
Or am I missing something?
[font="Courier New"]ProcessTask:WriteToLog(Start) -> SQLTask:RunScript -> FlatFileTask:DumpTableToCSV -> FileSystemTask:CopyFile -> ProcessTask:WriteToLog(End)[/font]
February 28, 2012 at 3:11 am
Joe,
It seems you are getting a bit frustrated with the comments about reoranising the data - we have all been there. Following on from the previous posting which gave...
September 8, 2011 at 9:26 am
@ JBANKO
What part(s) of the application are you responsible for?
Are you just trying to generate reports or are you trying to improve functionality (e.g. get the application to automatically reassign...
September 7, 2011 at 2:37 am
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[JobLog](
[JobID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[ParentJobID] [nchar](255) NOT NULL,
[StoredProcedureName] [nchar](255) NOT NULL,
[StartDatetime] [datetime] NULL,
[EndDatetime] [datetime] NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
ID in an identity field
No indexes
No triggers
table is currently only about 80...
September 7, 2011 at 2:22 am
Just as an aside, seeing as you are a join noobee
This will only return patients WITH telephone numbers. If you want all patients AND the telephone number if...
September 6, 2011 at 3:27 am
Can't use CTEs, we are on SQL2000 🙁
We are on SQL2000 aren't we???
Seriously though, normalising the data will make your life a lot easier. You can store it in...
September 6, 2011 at 2:48 am
@jeff Williams
The left joins are (were) only for development where I don't want to lose any records so that I can see if there are any data issues...
August 22, 2011 at 5:04 am
Taking out all the left joins and replacing with joins solves the speed, but at the risk of losing records, But I think it is acceptable losses. If the...
August 20, 2011 at 6:08 am
Thanks Phil,
I'n not sure that construct will work for me as the Coalesce() is to determine a value to be updated.
Using the Union syntax is still running down the dataset...
August 19, 2011 at 8:35 am
My final solution was to go with a single wide table with every existing combination in it. I then have a routine which checks the datasource and adds new...
August 19, 2011 at 7:40 am
Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 622 total)