Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 34 total)
Marios, what version of SQL Sentry are you using? With 6.x you should certainly be able to dig deeper into the individual queries where IO_Completion is high - for example...
August 15, 2011 at 7:26 am
Usually you should avoid going backwards when at all possible. One issue you may come across is if you apply SP2, enable 15K partitions, then try to move that...
January 20, 2011 at 10:04 am
Full disclosure: I work for SQL Sentry. I couldn't pass up the opportunity to work for a company whose products I believed so strongly in, and whose people I've...
January 16, 2011 at 11:40 am
I was actually suggesting that the DTA might have created some indexes you do not need. You need to be very careful about the recommendations it makes and ensure...
December 3, 2010 at 9:13 am
So what are the other 14 rows in sysindexes? Did you ever run the index tuning wizard against this database?
December 2, 2010 at 2:38 pm
Is it possible this table has 19 indexes?
December 2, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Assuming there are rows in the table, this should show each stat for the table:
SELECT name, *
FROM sysindexes AS i
WHERE i.id = OBJECT_ID('mytable')
AND [first] IS NULL;
How many rows...
December 2, 2010 at 2:12 pm
Happy to help. Sadly it's not going to help the OP using 2000. 🙁
December 2, 2010 at 1:33 pm
Ad hoc batches in 2000, IIRC, are inspected differently. They actually inspect the entire query batch, and it is case and white space sensitive as well. Since your...
December 2, 2010 at 1:22 pm
Also CU 10 for RTM incorrectly has SP1 as the label.
November 27, 2010 at 9:27 am
This is clever and a little more flexible than some of the other techniques - and useful if all you need to do is return the output directly to the...
June 17, 2010 at 11:13 am
Phil Factor (1/25/2010)
January 25, 2010 at 11:07 am
You will need to classify based on the job name, and no you cannot customize what appears under APP_NAME() - I thought I filed a Connect item for this but...
September 15, 2009 at 3:43 pm
sp_reset_connection will trigger re-classification.
At least that's what this blog post seems to imply (I haven't tested it):
http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/archive/2009/02/23/how-it-works-resource-governor-internal-group.aspx
September 3, 2009 at 8:23 am
You can't use DB_NAME() in the classifier function, since classification happens after login but NOT before assigning database (or determining default), user options, etc. As a workaround you could...
August 12, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 34 total)