Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 123 total)
Thanks for the reply Lance
Well the error that I receive is so-known "CREATE Table Permission Denied on db ..." error.
Even if the user is explicitly states [dbo].[table_name] it is...
July 25, 2006 at 2:39 am
If I understood right;
you can change the SQL service startup account. In SQL 2000 EM right click on related SQL Server, open properties, go security tab, change "Startup service account" to...
July 21, 2006 at 1:29 am
Lee,
in short without "sa" developers can make no harm on the productional dbs. Additionally if the DBA's let the developers play with productional dbs then this security "gap" cannot be...
July 19, 2006 at 2:55 pm
Hi Lee
Firstly: what are the concerns that you have with SQL MS 2005?
Secondly: If your developers were using isqlw for developing sp's then why not to use SQL MS...
July 19, 2006 at 1:26 pm
In our shop we are two DBA's who are responsible for almost everything that is related to SQL somewhat. Administration, optimising, T-SQL coding and helping developer to code SQL etc. If...
July 19, 2006 at 1:22 pm
Try dropping and re-creating the stored procedure. It strange but sometimes it works. Don't forget to back-up permissions.
July 19, 2006 at 11:04 am
Hi John!
We have faced that kind of problem once and we fixed it with hardware vendor. I think it's not a bottleneck but something related with your disk controllers. Apply...
July 19, 2006 at 6:31 am
The best way that I know is to use a trace to capture all the executions, but it costs you know
July 19, 2006 at 6:07 am
Well EdVassie you are right in some sense
Sometimes you really want to get-rid of the extra load that are caused by sysadmin guys
July 19, 2006 at 5:53 am
I think If you are DB-ADMIN on that machine (which makes you responsible for every heartbeat that machine does) then it sounds very logical that you should be localadmin on...
July 19, 2006 at 4:20 am
Glat to hear that you recover
Must be a tough stress though
July 18, 2006 at 7:57 am
Thanks Ryan!
It a good idea to use sql_variant indeed. I suggested the developer to use sql_variant and she stated that her resultsets has different number of columns
July 18, 2006 at 7:20 am
Thanks John,
I wish I could do that but the stored procedure is compiled by another developer and cannot be changed for this purpose.
Additionally the resutset structure is not just...
July 18, 2006 at 2:18 am
Is it possible that you accidentally restore over your existing master db? Since you are saying that you can see the "jobs" (as they are stored in msdb) and no...
July 17, 2006 at 11:56 am
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 123 total)